Verwandte Artikel zu The Argument from Injustice: A Reply to Legal Positivism
Inhaltsangabe
At the heart of this book is the age-old question of how law and morality are related. The legal positivist, insisting on the separation of the two, explicates the concept of law independently of morality. The author challenges this view, arguing that there are, first, conceptually necessary connections between law and morality and, second, normative reasons for including moral elements in the concept of law. While the conceptual argument alone is too limited to establish a sufficiently strong connection between law and morality, and the normative argument alone fails to address the nature of law, the two arguments together support a nonpositivistic concept of law, toppling legal positivism qua comprehensive theory of law.
The author makes his case within a conceptual framework of five distinctions that can be variously combined to represent a multiplicity of presuppositions or perspectives underlying the enquiry into the relationship of law and morality. In this context, it can indeed be shown that there are perspectives that bespeak solely a positivistic concept of law. The decisive point, however, is that there is a perspective, necessary to the law, that necessarily presupposes a nonpositivistic concept of law. This is the perspective of a participant in the legal system, asking for the correct answer to a legal question in this legal system. The participant-thesis is demonstrated by appeal to Gustav Radbruch's formula (extreme injustice is not law) and to the judge's balancing of principles in deciding a concrete case. The author arrives at a concept of law that systematically links classical elements of legal positivism - authoritative issuance and social efficacy - with the desideratum of nonpositivistic legal theory, correctness of content.
Die Inhaltsangabe kann sich auf eine andere Ausgabe dieses Titels beziehen.
Über die Autorin bzw. den Autor
Robert Alexy has been Professor of Public Law and Legal Philosophy at Christian Albrechts University, Kiel, since 1986. He was President of the German Section of the International Association for Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy (IVR) from 1994-1998. Other books published by OUP include A Theory of Legal Argumentation and A Theory of Constitutional Rights.
„Über diesen Titel“ kann sich auf eine andere Ausgabe dieses Titels beziehen.
EUR 10,53
EUR 4,02 für den Versand von Vereinigtes Königreich nach Deutschland
Versandziele, Kosten & DauerNeu kaufen
Diesen Artikel anzeigen
EUR 36,00
EUR 5,72 für den Versand von Vereinigtes Königreich nach Deutschland
Versandziele, Kosten & Dauer
Suchergebnisse für The Argument from Injustice: A Reply to Legal Positivism
Beispielbild für diese ISBN
The Argument from Injustice: A Reply to Legal Positivism
Verlag:
Oxford University Press, 2010
ISBN 10: 0199584214
ISBN 13: 9780199584215
Gebraucht
Paperback
Anbieter: WorldofBooks, Goring-By-Sea, WS, Vereinigtes Königreich
Verkäuferbewertung 5 von 5 Sternen
Paperback. Zustand: Very Good. The book has been read, but is in excellent condition. Pages are intact and not marred by notes or highlighting. The spine remains undamaged. Bestandsnummer des Verkäufers GOR013112707
Anzahl: 1 verfügbar
Beispielbild für diese ISBN
The Argument from Injustice: A Reply to Legal Positivism
Anbieter: Ria Christie Collections, Uxbridge, Vereinigtes Königreich
Verkäuferbewertung 5 von 5 Sternen
Zustand: New. In. Bestandsnummer des Verkäufers ria9780199584215_new
Anzahl: Mehr als 20 verfügbar
Beispielbild für diese ISBN
The Argument from Injustice
Print-on-DemandAnbieter: PBShop.store US, Wood Dale, IL, USA
Verkäuferbewertung 5 von 5 Sternen
PAP. Zustand: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. THIS BOOK IS PRINTED ON DEMAND. Established seller since 2000. Bestandsnummer des Verkäufers L0-9780199584215
Anzahl: Mehr als 20 verfügbar
Beispielbild für diese ISBN
The Argument from Injustice
Print-on-DemandAnbieter: PBShop.store UK, Fairford, GLOS, Vereinigtes Königreich
Verkäuferbewertung 5 von 5 Sternen
PAP. Zustand: New. New Book. Delivered from our UK warehouse in 4 to 14 business days. THIS BOOK IS PRINTED ON DEMAND. Established seller since 2000. Bestandsnummer des Verkäufers L0-9780199584215
Anzahl: Mehr als 20 verfügbar
Foto des Verkäufers
The Argument from Injustice
Anbieter: moluna, Greven, Deutschland
Verkäuferbewertung 4 von 5 Sternen
Zustand: New. Alexy confronts the legal positivist view in this classic work of legal philosophy. He formulates an accessible concept of law that systematically links classical elements of legal positivism with nonpositivistic legal theory, challenging the prevailing or. Bestandsnummer des Verkäufers 446844856
Anzahl: Mehr als 20 verfügbar
Foto des Verkäufers
The Argument from Injustice
Anbieter: Rarewaves.com UK, London, Vereinigtes Königreich
Verkäuferbewertung 5 von 5 Sternen
Paperback. Zustand: New. At the heart of this book is the age-old question of how law and morality are related. The legal positivist, insisting on the separation of the two, explicates the concept of law independently of morality. The author challenges this view, arguing that there are, first, conceptually necessary connections between law and morality and, second, normative reasons for including moral elements in the concept of law. While the conceptual argument alone is too limited to establish a sufficiently strong connection between law and morality, and the normative argument alone fails to address the nature of law, the two arguments together support a nonpositivistic concept of law, toppling legal positivism qua comprehensive theory of law.The author makes his case within a conceptual framework of five distinctions that can be variously combined to represent a multiplicity of presuppositions or perspectives underlying the enquiry into the relationship of law and morality. In this context, it can indeed be shown that there are perspectives that bespeak solely a positivistic concept of law. The decisive point, however, is that there is a perspective, necessary to the law, that necessarily presupposes a nonpositivistic concept of law. This is the perspective of a participant in the legal system, asking for the correct answer to a legal question in this legal system. The participant-thesis is demonstrated by appeal to Gustav Radbruch's formula (extreme injustice is not law) and to the judge's balancing of principles in deciding a concrete case. The author arrives at a concept of law that systematically links classical elements of legal positivism - authoritative issuance and social efficacy - with the desideratum of nonpositivistic legal theory, correctness of content. Bestandsnummer des Verkäufers LU-9780199584215
Anzahl: Mehr als 20 verfügbar
Foto des Verkäufers
The Argument from Injustice
Anbieter: Rarewaves.com USA, London, LONDO, Vereinigtes Königreich
Verkäuferbewertung 5 von 5 Sternen
Paperback. Zustand: New. At the heart of this book is the age-old question of how law and morality are related. The legal positivist, insisting on the separation of the two, explicates the concept of law independently of morality. The author challenges this view, arguing that there are, first, conceptually necessary connections between law and morality and, second, normative reasons for including moral elements in the concept of law. While the conceptual argument alone is too limited to establish a sufficiently strong connection between law and morality, and the normative argument alone fails to address the nature of law, the two arguments together support a nonpositivistic concept of law, toppling legal positivism qua comprehensive theory of law.The author makes his case within a conceptual framework of five distinctions that can be variously combined to represent a multiplicity of presuppositions or perspectives underlying the enquiry into the relationship of law and morality. In this context, it can indeed be shown that there are perspectives that bespeak solely a positivistic concept of law. The decisive point, however, is that there is a perspective, necessary to the law, that necessarily presupposes a nonpositivistic concept of law. This is the perspective of a participant in the legal system, asking for the correct answer to a legal question in this legal system. The participant-thesis is demonstrated by appeal to Gustav Radbruch's formula (extreme injustice is not law) and to the judge's balancing of principles in deciding a concrete case. The author arrives at a concept of law that systematically links classical elements of legal positivism - authoritative issuance and social efficacy - with the desideratum of nonpositivistic legal theory, correctness of content. Bestandsnummer des Verkäufers LU-9780199584215
Anzahl: Mehr als 20 verfügbar
Beispielbild für diese ISBN
The Argument from Injustice: A Reply to Legal Positivism
Verlag:
Oxford University Press, 2010
ISBN 10: 0199584214
ISBN 13: 9780199584215
Neu
Paperback / softback
Anbieter: THE SAINT BOOKSTORE, Southport, Vereinigtes Königreich
Verkäuferbewertung 5 von 5 Sternen
Paperback / softback. Zustand: New. This item is printed on demand. New copy - Usually dispatched within 5-9 working days 233. Bestandsnummer des Verkäufers C9780199584215
Anzahl: Mehr als 20 verfügbar
Beispielbild für diese ISBN
The Argument from Injustice: A Reply to Legal Positivism
Anbieter: Chiron Media, Wallingford, Vereinigtes Königreich
Verkäuferbewertung 4 von 5 Sternen
PF. Zustand: New. Bestandsnummer des Verkäufers 6666-IUK-9780199584215
Anzahl: 10 verfügbar
Foto des Verkäufers
The Argument from Injustice : A Reply to Legal Positivism
Print-on-DemandAnbieter: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Deutschland
Verkäuferbewertung 5 von 5 Sternen
Taschenbuch. Zustand: Neu. nach der Bestellung gedruckt Neuware - Printed after ordering - Alexy confronts the legal positivist view in this classic work of legal philosophy. He formulates an accessible concept of law that systematically links classical elements of legal positivism with nonpositivistic legal theory, challenging the prevailing orthodoxies of modern jurisprudence. Bestandsnummer des Verkäufers 9780199584215
Anzahl: 1 verfügbar