Tort reform is a favorite cause for many business leaders and right-leaning politicians, who contend that out-ofcontrol lawsuits throttle growth and inflate costs, particularly in healthcare. Less is said about how such reforms might affect the ability of individuals to recover damages for injuries suffered through another party’s negligence. On that count, Texas―where efforts at tort reform have been energetic and successful―provides an opportunity to appraise the outcome for plaintiffs and their lawyers, an opportunity that Stephen Daniels and Joanne Martin take full advantage of in this timely and provocative work. Because much of the action on tort reform takes place on the state level, a look at the experience of Texas, a large and important state with a very active plaintiff’s bar, is especially instructive.
Plaintiffs’ lawyers work on a contingency fee basis, collecting compensation for themselves as a percentage only if they win. Reduce lawyers’ ability to use contingency fees as compensation, as tort reform inevitably does, and you reduce their economic incentive to do this work. Daniels’ and Martin’s study bears this out. Drawing on over 20 years of research, extensive surveys and interviews, the authors explore the impact the tort reform movement in Texas has had on the ability of plaintiffs to obtain judgments―in short on private citizens’ meaningful access to the full power of the law. In the course of their analysis, the authors explain the history and economics behind the workings of the plaintiffs’ bar. They explore how lawyers select cases and clients, as well as the referral process that moves cases among lawyers and allows for specialization. They also examine the effects of medical malpractice reforms on plaintiffs’ lawyers―reforms that often close the courthouse doors to certain types of people―tort reform’s “hidden victims.”
Plaintiffs’ lawyers are the civil justice system’s gatekeepers, providing meaningful access to the rights the law provides. Daniels’s and Martin’s thorough and fair-minded work offers a unique and sobering perspective on how tort reform can curtail this access―and thus, the legal rights of American citizens.
Die Inhaltsangabe kann sich auf eine andere Ausgabe dieses Titels beziehen.
Stephen Daniels is a research professor for the American Bar Foundation.
Joanne Martin is Director of Administrative Services at the American Bar Endowment.
„Über diesen Titel“ kann sich auf eine andere Ausgabe dieses Titels beziehen.
EUR 8,04 für den Versand von USA nach Deutschland
Versandziele, Kosten & DauerGratis für den Versand innerhalb von/der Deutschland
Versandziele, Kosten & DauerAnbieter: ThriftBooks-Atlanta, AUSTELL, GA, USA
Hardcover. Zustand: Good. No Jacket. Pages can have notes/highlighting. Spine may show signs of wear. ~ ThriftBooks: Read More, Spend Less 1.23. Bestandsnummer des Verkäufers G0700620737I3N00
Anzahl: 1 verfügbar
Anbieter: moluna, Greven, Deutschland
Zustand: New. KlappentextrnrnTort reform is a favorite cause for many business leaders and right-leaning politicians, who contend that out-ofcontrol lawsuits throttle growth and inflate costs. Less is said about how such reforms might affect the ability of in. Bestandsnummer des Verkäufers 898499675
Anzahl: Mehr als 20 verfügbar
Anbieter: Michener & Rutledge Booksellers, Inc., Baldwin City, KS, USA
Hardcover. Zustand: Very Good. Zustand des Schutzumschlags: Very Good. Light dent to top edge of front cover, otherwise text clean and solid; 9 X 6 X 1.20 inches; 272 pages. Bestandsnummer des Verkäufers 210562
Anzahl: 1 verfügbar
Anbieter: Open Books, Chicago, IL, USA
hardcover. Zustand: Very Good. Light edge wear. Open Books is a nonprofit social venture that provides literacy experiences for thousands of readers each year through inspiring programs and creative capitalization of books. Bestandsnummer des Verkäufers mon0000758527
Anzahl: 1 verfügbar
Anbieter: Kennys Bookshop and Art Galleries Ltd., Galway, GY, Irland
Zustand: New. 2015. Hardcover. . . . . . Bestandsnummer des Verkäufers V9780700620739
Anzahl: 18 verfügbar
Anbieter: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Deutschland
Buch. Zustand: Neu. Neuware - Tort reform is a favorite cause for many business leaders and right-leaning politicians, who contend that out-ofcontrol lawsuits throttle growth and inflate costs. Less is said about how such reforms might affect the ability of individuals to recover damages. On that count, Texas provides an opportunity to appraise the outcome for plaintiffs and their lawyers, an opportunity that Stephen Daniels and Joanne Martin take full advantage of in this timely and provocative work. Bestandsnummer des Verkäufers 9780700620739
Anzahl: 2 verfügbar
Anbieter: Revaluation Books, Exeter, Vereinigtes Königreich
Hardcover. Zustand: Brand New. 272 pages. 9.25x6.25x1.25 inches. In Stock. Bestandsnummer des Verkäufers x-0700620737
Anzahl: 2 verfügbar
Anbieter: Kennys Bookstore, Olney, MD, USA
Zustand: New. 2015. Hardcover. . . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland. Bestandsnummer des Verkäufers V9780700620739
Anzahl: 18 verfügbar
Anbieter: INDOO, Avenel, NJ, USA
Zustand: New. Brand New. Bestandsnummer des Verkäufers 9780700620739
Anzahl: Mehr als 20 verfügbar
Anbieter: Grand Eagle Retail, Fairfield, OH, USA
Hardcover. Zustand: new. Hardcover. Tort reform is a favorite cause for many business leaders and right-leaning politicians, who contend that out-ofcontrol lawsuits throttle growth and inflate costs, particularly in healthcare. Less is said about how such reforms might affect the ability of individuals to recover damages for injuries suffered through another partys negligence. On that count, Texaswhere efforts at tort reform have been energetic and successfulprovides an opportunity to appraise the outcome for plaintiffs and their lawyers, an opportunity that Stephen Daniels and Joanne Martin take full advantage of in this timely and provocative work. Because much of the action on tort reform takes place on the state level, a look at the experience of Texas, a large and important state with a very active plaintiffs bar, is especially instructive.Plaintiffs lawyers work on a contingency fee basis, collecting compensation for themselves as a percentage only if they win. Reduce lawyers ability to use contingency fees as compensation, as tort reform inevitably does, and you reduce their economic incentive to do this work. Daniels and Martins study bears this out. Drawing on over 20 years of research, extensive surveys and interviews, the authors explore the impact the tort reform movement in Texas has had on the ability of plaintiffs to obtain judgmentsin short on private citizens meaningful access to the full power of the law. In the course of their analysis, the authors explain the history and economics behind the workings of the plaintiffs bar. They explore how lawyers select cases and clients, as well as the referral process that moves cases among lawyers and allows for specialization. They also examine the effects of medical malpractice reforms on plaintiffs lawyersreforms that often close the courthouse doors to certain types of peopletort reforms hidden victims.Plaintiffs lawyers are the civil justice systems gatekeepers, providing meaningful access to the rights the law provides. Danielss and Martins thorough and fair-minded work offers a unique and sobering perspective on how tort reform can curtail this accessand thus, the legal rights of American citizens. "Tort reform is a favorite cause for many business leaders and right-leaning politicians, who contend that out-of-control lawsuits throttle growth and inflate costs, particularly in healthcare. Less is said about how such reforms might affect the ability of individuals to recover damages for injuries suffered through another party's negligence. On that count, Texas--where efforts at tort reform have been energetic and successful--provides an opportunity to appraise the outcome for plaintiffs and their lawyers, an opportunity that Stephen Daniels and Joanne Martin take full advantage of in this timely and provocative work. Because much of the action on tort reform takes place on the state level, a look at the experience of Texas, a large and important state with a very active plaintiff's bar, is especially instructive. Plaintiffs' lawyers work on a contingency fee basis, collecting compensation for themselves as a percentage only if they win. Reduce lawyers' ability to use contingency fees as compensation, as tort reform inevitably does, and you reduce their economic incentive to do this work. Daniels' and Martin's study bears this out. Drawing on over 20 years of research, extensive surveys and interviews, the authors explore the impact the tort reform movement in Texas has had on the ability of plaintiffs to obtain judgments--in short on private citizens' meaningful access to the full power of the law. In the course of their analysis, the authors explain the history and economics behind the workings of the plaintiffs' bar. They explore how lawyers select cases and clients, as well as the referral process tha Shipping may be from multiple locations in the US or from the UK, depending on stock availability. Bestandsnummer des Verkäufers 9780700620739
Anzahl: 1 verfügbar