Agnotology: The Making and Unmaking of Ignorance - Softcover

 
9780804759014: Agnotology: The Making and Unmaking of Ignorance

Inhaltsangabe

What don't we know, and why don't we know it? What keeps ignorance alive, or allows it to be used as a political instrument? Agnotology—the study of ignorance—provides a new theoretical perspective to broaden traditional questions about "how we know" to ask: Why don't we know what we don't know? The essays assembled in Agnotology show that ignorance is often more than just an absence of knowledge; it can also be the outcome of cultural and political struggles. Ignorance has a history and a political geography, but there are also things people don't want you to know ("Doubt is our product" is the tobacco industry slogan). Individual chapters treat examples from the realms of global climate change, military secrecy, female orgasm, environmental denialism, Native American paleontology, theoretical archaeology, racial ignorance, and more. The goal of this volume is to better understand how and why various forms of knowing do not come to be, or have disappeared, or have become invisible.

Die Inhaltsangabe kann sich auf eine andere Ausgabe dieses Titels beziehen.

Über die Autorinnen und Autoren

Robert N. Proctor is Professor of the History of Science at Stanford University and the author of The Nazi War on Cancer (1999) and Cancer Wars: How Politics Shapes What We Know and Don't Know (1995). Londa Schiebinger is the John L. Hinds Professor of History of Science and the Barbara D. Finberg Director of the Clayman Institute for Gender Research at Stanford University. Her recent books include Plants and Empire: Colonial Bioprospecting in the Atlantic World (2004) and Gendered Innovations in Science and Engineering (forthcoming from Stanford).


Robert N. Proctor is Professor of the History of Science at Stanford University and the author of The Nazi War on Cancer (1999) and Cancer Wars: How Politics Shapes What We Know and Don't Know (1995). Londa Schiebinger is the John L. Hinds Professor of History of Science and the Barbara D. Finberg Director of the Clayman Institute for Gender Research at Stanford University. Her recent books include Plants and Empire: Colonial Bioprospecting in the Atlantic World (2004) and Gendered Innovations in Science and Engineering (forthcoming from Stanford).

Auszug. © Genehmigter Nachdruck. Alle Rechte vorbehalten.

AGNOTOLOGY

The Making and Unmaking of Ignorance

By Robert N. Proctor, Londa Schiebinger

Stanford University Press

Copyright © 2008 Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University
All rights reserved.
ISBN: 978-0-8047-5901-4

Contents

Preface....................................................................vii
1. Agnotology: A Missing Term to Describe the Cultural Production of
Ignorance (and Its Study) ROBERT N. PROCTOR...............................
1
PART I SECRECY, SELECTION, AND SUPPRESSION................................
2. Removing Knowledge: The Logic of Modern Censorship PETER GALISON.......37
3. Challenging Knowledge: How Climate Science Became a Victim of the Cold
War NAOMI ORESKES AND ERIK M. CONWAY......................................
55
4. Manufactured Uncertainty: Contested Science and the Protection of the
Public's Health and Environment DAVID MICHAELS............................
90
5. Coming to Understand: Orgasm and the Epistemology of Ignorance NANCY
TUANA......................................................................
108
PART II LOST KNOWLEDGE, LOST WORLDS.......................................
6. West Indian Abortifacients and the Making of Ignorance LONDA
SCHIEBINGER................................................................
149
7. Suppression of Indigenous Fossil Knowledge: From Claverack, New York,
1705 to Agate Springs, Nebraska, 2005 ADRIENNE MAYOR......................
163
8. Mapping Ignorance in Archaeology: The Advantages of Historical
Hindsight ALISON WYLIE....................................................
183
PART III THEORIZING IGNORANCE.............................................
9. Social theories of Ignorance MICHAEL J. SMITHSON.......................209
10. White Ignorance CHARLES W. MILLS......................................230
11. Risk Management versus the Precautionary Principle: Agnotology as a
Strategy in the Debate over Genetically Engineered organisms DAVID
MAGNUS.....................................................................
250
12. Smoking out objectivity: Journalistic gears in the Agnotology Machine
JON CHRISTENSEN............................................................
266
List of Contributors.......................................................283
Index......................................................................289

Excerpt

CHAPTER 1

Agnotology

A Missing Term to Describe the CulturalProduction of Ignorance (and Its Study)

ROBERT N. PROCTOR


We are often unaware of the scope and structure of our ignorance. Ignoranceis not just a blank space on a person's mental map. It has contours and coherence,and for all I know rules of operation as well. So as a corollary to writingabout what we know, maybe we should add getting familiar with our ignorance.Thomas Pynchon, 1984

Doubt is our product.

Brown & Williamson Tobacco Company, internal memo, 1969


PHILOSOPHERS LOVE TO TALK ABOUT KNOWLEDGE. A whole fieldis devoted to reflection on the topic, with product tie-ins to professorshipsand weighty conferences. Epistemology is serious business, taughtin academies the world over: there is "moral" and "social" epistemology,epistemology of the sacred, the closet, and the family. There is a ComputationalEpistemology Laboratory at the University of Waterloo, and aCenter for Epistemology at the Free University in Amsterdam. A Googlesearch turns up separate websites for "constructivist," "feminist," and"evolutionary" epistemology, of course, but also "libidinal," "android,""Quaker," "Internet," and (my favorite) "erotometaphysical" epistemology.Harvard offers a course in the field (without the erotometaphysicalpart), which (if we are to believe its website) explores the epistemic statusof weighty claims like "the standard meter is 1 meter long" and "I am nota brain in a vat." We seem to know a lot about knowledge.

What is remarkable, though, is how little we know about ignorance.There is not even a well-known word for its study (though our hope is tochange that), no fancy conferences or polished websites. This is particularlyremarkable, given (a) how much ignorance there is, (b) how many kindsthere are, and (c) how consequential ignorance is in our lives.

The point of this volume is to argue that there is much, in fact, to know.Ignorance has many friends and enemies, and figures big in everything fromtrade association propaganda to military operations to slogans chanted atchildren. Lawyers think a lot about it, since it often surfaces in consumerproduct liability and tort litigation, where the question is often "Whoknew what, and when?" Ignorance has many interesting surrogates andoverlaps in myriad ways with—as it is generated by—secrecy, stupidity,apathy, censorship, disinformation, faith, and forgetfulness, all of whichare science-twitched. Ignorance hides in the shadows of philosophy and isfrowned upon in sociology, but it also pops up in a great deal of popularrhetoric: it's no excuse, it's what can't hurt you, it's bliss. Ignorance has ahistory and a complex political and sexual geography, and does a lot ofother odd and arresting work that bears exploring.

And deploring—though we don't see inquiry in this area as necessarilyhaving the goal of rectification. Ignorance is most commonly seen (ortrivialized) in this way, as something in need of correction, a kind of naturalabsence or void where knowledge has not yet spread. As educators, ofcourse, we are committed to spreading knowledge. But ignorance is morethan a void—and not even always a bad thing. No one needs or wants toknow everything all the time; and surely all of us know things we wouldrather others not know. A founding principle of liberal states is that omnisciencecan be dangerous, and that some things should be kept private.Rights to privacy are essentially a form of sanctioned ignorance: liberalgovernments are (supposed to be) barred from knowing everything; inquisitorsmust have warrants. Juries are also supposed to be kept ignorant,since knowledge can be a form of bias. There is virtuous ignorance, in theform of resistance to (or limits placed on) dangerous knowledge.

The causes of ignorance are multiple and diverse. Not many peopleknow that the biggest building in the world is a semi-secret facility builtto produce explosive uranium-235, using enormous magnets, near a nondescripttown in southern Ohio (Piketon); but that is for reasons that aredifferent from why we don't know much about the origin of life, or anythingat all about time before the Big Bang circa 14 billion years ago. Andthere are many different ways not to know. Ignorance can be the flipside ofmemory, what we don't know because we have forgotten, parts of whichcan be restored by historical inquiries but most of which is forever lost.(And we often cannot say which.) Ignorance can be made or unmade, andscience can be complicit in either process.


THE PURPOSE OF THE PRESENT VOLUME IS PROGRAMMATIC, to begin adiscussion of ignorance as more than the "not yet known" or the...

„Über diesen Titel“ kann sich auf eine andere Ausgabe dieses Titels beziehen.

Weitere beliebte Ausgaben desselben Titels

9780804756525: Agnotology: The Making and Unmaking of Ignorance

Vorgestellte Ausgabe

ISBN 10:  080475652X ISBN 13:  9780804756525
Verlag: Stanford University Press, 2008
Hardcover