The Historical Reliability of the New Testament: Countering the Challenges to Evangelical Christian Beliefs (B&h Studies in Christian Apologetics) - Softcover

Blomberg, Craig L.

Softcover

ISBN 10: 0805464379 ISBN 13: 9780805464375

Verlag: Broadman & Holman Publishers, 2016

Inhaltsangabe

Questions about the reliability of the New Testament are commonly raised today both by biblical scholars and popular media. Drawing on decades of research, Craig Blomberg addresses all of the major objections to the historicity of the New Testament in one comprehensive volume. Topics addressed include the formation of the Gospels, the transmission of the text, the formation of the canon, alleged contradictions, the relationship between Jesus and Paul, supposed Pauline forgeries, other gospels, miracles, and many more. Historical corroborations of details from all parts of the New Testament are also presented throughout. The Historical Reliability of the New Testament marshals the latest scholarship in responding to New Testament objections, while remaining accessible to non-specialists.

Über diesen Titel

Über die Autorin bzw. den Autor

Craig Blomberg is distinguished professor of New Testament at Denver Seminary.

Auszug. © Genehmigter Nachdruck. Alle Rechte vorbehalten.

The Historical Reliability of the New Testament

By Craig L. Blomberg

B&H Publishing Group

Copyright © 2016 Craig L. Blomberg
All rights reserved.

ISBN: 978-0-8054-6437-5

Contents

Introduction, 
Chapter 1: The Formation of the Synoptic Gospels, 
Chapter 2: Contradictions Among the Synoptics?, 
Chapter 3: Corroboration of the Synoptics, 
Chapter 4: The Formation of the Gospel of John, 
Chapter 5: Evidence for the Accuracy of John, 
Chapter 6: The Credibility of Acts, 
Chapter 7: Paul in Acts and in the Epistles, 
Chapter 8: Forgeries Among the Epistles of Paul?, 
Chapter 9: Is Paul the True Founder of Christianity?, 
Chapter 10: The Non-Pauline Epistles — New Testament Anomalies?, 
Chapter 11: The Book of Revelation — Are Historical Matters Even Relevant?, 
Chapter 12: The Nag Hammadi Literature and New Testament Apocrypha, 
Chapter 13: Textual Transmission and the Formation of the Canon, 
Chapter 14: Miracles in the New Testament World and Today, 
Conclusion, 
Name Index, 
Subject Index, 
Scripture Index, 

CHAPTER 1

The Formation of the Synoptic Gospels

Imagine the Internet buzzing with some latest discovery of an ancient document dug up in Israel. It is written in Hebrew and appears to shed startling new light on the Jewish religion of its day. But is it authentic? Are its contents true? How would reputable archaeologists, historians, and linguists proceed? Early in their analysis would be the attempts to answer a variety of questions. Can we determine the author of the document and its original setting? Are we able to estimate a date for the manuscript and dates for any events or activities described in the manuscript? May we discern anything about its composition, that is, how it was written? Do its contents parallel those of any other documents from the ancient Mediterranean world? If so, how similar or different are they? These and related questions usually take time to answer, even though ours is a world that demands instant information. One thing, therefore, we can almost certainly know when new discoveries like this hit the press is that every immediate opinion expressed by someone is tentative and provisional. Scholarly consensus, if it is achieved, will come much later, usually after all the initial publicity has died down. Unless one deliberately follows developments for a few months or even years, one risks believing the exact opposite or at least a considerable distortion of what is ultimately decided about the new find!

The New Testament Gospels, of course, have been known for nearly twenty centuries. Modern biblical scholarship has investigated virtually every subject one could think to ask about them from almost every conceivable angle for more than 200 years. Almost by definition what counts as news is that which is new, novel, or arresting. Virtually by definition what is utterly unprecedented in New Testament scholarship is almost guaranteed to be false because of the amount of investigation that has already gone into the discipline! It is almost guaranteed but not always. Still the proper response to any news item portraying Christian origins in some sensational new light is skepticism. Proceed cautiously, consult the sources, determine their credibility, look for dissenting views, and give the matter some time to see what, if anything is resolved. Many new theories are old ones recycled and tweaked, even though previously debunked. But a new generation that fails to study history carefully doesn't know this and so can fall prey to the new appearance of the theory. Even the theorist may not be aware how well-worn his or her ideas actually are.

In assessing the reliability of the Gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke, some issues must be addressed that recur for all New Testament documents. Others are unique to the literary genre of a Gospel. And because the contents of Matthew, Mark, and Luke overlap to a great extent in ways not true of other Gospels, inside or outside the canon, still other concerns affect the analysis of the three Synoptics alone. In this chapter we will address the issues of authorship, date, and circumstances of their composition, as is necessary for all biblical documents. We will look at the question of the nature of a Gospel and its author's intentions, an issue unique to Gospels' scholarship. Finally, distinctive to the study of Matthew, Mark, and Luke, we will address the "Synoptic Problem"— the question of the literary relationship of the first three Gospels — along with related subjects that such study raises. These will include the nature of the oral tradition that preceded the writing of the Synoptics. Assessing the credibility of the Gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke represents the ultimate goal of our investigation in all three of these categories.

The Settings of the Synoptics

What can we know about the writers of these three documents, along with the time and circumstances of their writing? Answers to a large degree depend on how much we value external evidence as over against internal evidence. External evidence refers to what information we have about the composition of a document apart from the contents of that document. Internal evidence refers to what we may deduce from the document itself. The external evidence for the formation of the Gospels begins to appear early in the second century. The standard New Testament introductions along with all the major commentaries on individual Gospels typically reproduce this information in detail; we need highlight only the most important claims here. Which internal evidence is considered significant varies widely from one scholar to the next; again we will note only the most commonly observed phenomena.

Authorship and Audiences

The Christian writer, Papias, early in the second century, offers the oldest known testimony concerning the Gospel of Matthew. His testimony is preserved in quotations by the early fourth-century church historian Eusebius. Several of the Greek words in his statement can be translated in more than one way, as indicated by the bracketed words that suggest alternate but probably less likely renderings: "Matthew composed [compiled] his logia in the Hebrew [Aramaic] language [dialect, style], and everyone translated [interpreted] it as they were able" (Hist. eccl. 3.39.16). The most ambiguous part of Papias's statement is the meaning in this context of the Greek word logia, a plural noun I have left untranslated. A logion (the singular form) essentially means "a saying," referring to spoken words. Some scholars have nevertheless assumed that here it refers to the entire Gospel because Eusebius has just cited what Papias taught about the whole Gospel of Mark, referring to it by means of the same word logia. Papias, who in turn is citing an elder named John, whom we will discuss later, says:

Mark was the translator [interpreter] of Peter; whatever he remembered, he wrote accurately, however not in order, of the things having been spoken or done by the Lord. For [Mark] neither heard the Lord nor followed him, but finally, as I said, was with Peter, who gave him the teachings as there was need (but not as making a systematic arrangement of the Lord's logia), so that Mark erred in no way (Hist. eccl. 3.39.15).

Despite those who would take logia to refer to a whole Gospel, it seems clear that the word here cannot refer to Mark's entire narrative because Papias is citing John the elder as...

Details zur Ausgabe

• Verlag: Broadman & Holman Publishers
• Erscheinungsdatum: 2016
• Sprache: Englisch
• ISBN 10: 0805464379
• ISBN 13: 9780805464375
• Einband: Taschenbuch
• Anzahl der Seiten: 783
• Kontakt zum Hersteller: Nicht verfügbar
• Verantwortliche Person: Nicht verfügbar