Verwandte Artikel zu On Irreconciliation (Journal of the Royal Anthropological...

On Irreconciliation (Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute Special Issue Book Series) - Softcover

 
9781119933267: On Irreconciliation (Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute Special Issue Book Series)

Inhaltsangabe

On Irreconciliation focuses on the less examined but frequent ethnographic instances when survivors refuse to forgive in response to persistent impunity of past injustices, particularly, in the face of absence-presence of the rule of law and staged processes of justice which serve the powerful.

  • An ethnographically-informed, interdisciplinary theorisation which makes irreconciliation visible in the contexts of Northern Ireland, Papua New Guinea, Mozambique, Bangladesh, Canada, Argentina, Sri Lanka, Colombia, USA and UK
  • Triangulates a discussion of the rule of law within processes of unresolved genocidal injustices, debates relating to statues of slave owners, racial prejudice and institutional responses 
  • Contributors demonstrate the relationship of irreconciliation with law, aesthetics, temporality, resistance and the limits of the concept
  • Makes a theoretical and ethnographic case for irreconciliation as both a social and political phenomenon
  • Proposes an understanding of the past based on a positive commitment to ‘irreconciliation’ which might interest anthropologists, historians, philosophers, critical legal and political theorists, peace, conflict resolution and transitional justice scholars

Die Inhaltsangabe kann sich auf eine andere Ausgabe dieses Titels beziehen.

Über die Autorin bzw. den Autor

Nayanika Mookherjee is Professor of Political Anthropology and Co- Director of the Institute of Advanced Studies, at Durham University. Based on her book The Spectral Wound: Sexual Violence, Public Memories and the Bangladesh War of 1971 (2015), in 2019 she co-authored a graphic novel and animation film and received the 2019 Praxis Award from the Washington Association of Professional Anthropologists. Her research addresses gendered violence during conflict, debates on irreconciliation and transnational adoption. She has published extensively on anthropology of violence, ethics and aesthetics including editing and contributing to journal special issues on ‘The Aesthetics of Nation’ (2011) (with Christopher Pinney), ‘The Self in South Asia,’ (2013); Aesthetics, Politics and Conflict (2015) (with Tariq Jazeel). She has had fellowships with ESRC, Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research, British Academy, Leverhulme and the Rockerfeller Foundation at Bellagio. In 2017, she co-founded and co-chaired Durham University’s first Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic (BAME) staff and postgraduate students’ network.

Von der hinteren Coverseite

Irreconciliation focuses on the less examined but frequent ethnographic instances when survivors refuse to forgive in response to persistent impunity of past injustices, particularly, in the face of absence-presence of the rule of law and staged processes of justice which serve the powerful. What are the various instances of not forgiving, not reconciling, remaining irreconciled to past, unresolved injustices? What forms does this position of not reconciling manifest in, apart from refusing to forgive? In most instances of post-conflict transitional justice and ‘positive’ reconciliatory exercises, it is incumbent upon survivors to forgive, reconcile and seek closure as an exhibition of peacefulness even in the aftermath of compromised processes that claim to address injustice. Various anthropologists have criticised reconciliation and related forms of ‘alternative justice’ extensively but within the framework of maintaining social bonds and the rule of law. This volume is an ethnographically-informed, interdisciplinary theorisation which makes irreconciliation visible in the contexts of Northern Ireland, Papua New Guinea, Mozambique, Bangladesh, Canada, Argentina, Sri Lanka, Colombia, USA and UK. Irreconciliation triangulates a discussion of the rule of law within processes of unresolved genocidal injustices, debates relating to statues of slave owners, racial prejudice and institutional responses. Contributors demonstrate the relationship of irreconciliation with law, aesthetics, temporality, resistance and the limits of the concept. This volume wishes to make a theoretical and ethnographic case for irreconciliation as both a social and political phenomenon. We propose an understanding of the past based on a positive commitment to ‘irreconciliation’ which might interest anthropologists, historians, philosophers, critical legal and political theorists, peace, conflict resolution and transitional justice scholars. Irreconciliation is a vigilance against impunity, against a ‘window-dressed’, symbolic performance of redressal.

„Über diesen Titel“ kann sich auf eine andere Ausgabe dieses Titels beziehen.