Putting Philosophy to Work: Inquiry and Its Place in Culture -- Essays on Science, Religion, Law, Literature, and Life - Softcover

Haack, Susan

Softcover

ISBN 10: 1616144939 ISBN 13: 9781616144937

Verlag: G38-Prometheus, 2013

Inhaltsangabe

This engaging and wide-ranging collection of essays is informed and unified by the conviction that philosophy can, and should, engage with real-world issues. Susan Haack's keen analytical skills and well-chosen illustrations illuminate a diverse range of cultural questions; and her direct style and wry sense of humor make complex ideas and subtle distinctions accessible to serious readers whatever their discipline or particular interests. Putting Philosophy to Work will appeal not only to philosophers but also to thoughtful scientists, economists, legal thinkers, historians, literary scholars, and humanists.

This new, expanded second edition includes several previously unpublished essays: a devastating critique of Karl Popper's highly (and dangerously) influential philosophy of science; a searching and thought-provoking analysis of scientism; and a groundbreaking paper on "academic ethics in a preposterous environment" that every professor, and would-be professor, should read.

Über diesen Titel

Über die Autorin bzw. den Autor

Susan Haack (Coral Gables, FL) is Distinguished Professor in the Humanities, Cooper Senior Scholar in Arts and Sciences, professor of philosophy, and professor of law at the University of Miami. She is the author of numerous highly acclaimed books, including Defending Science-Within Reason; Philosophy of Logics; Evidence and Inquiry; Deviant Logic, Fuzzy Logic: Beyond the Formalism; and Manifesto of a Passionate Moderate: Unfashionable Essays; and the editor of Pragmatism, Old and New. She is one of the handful of living philosophers in Peter King's 100 Philosophers: The Life and Work of the World's Greatest Thinkers, and she was included in the Sunday Independent's 2005 list of the ten most important women philosophers of all time.

Auszug. © Genehmigter Nachdruck. Alle Rechte vorbehalten.

PUTTING PHILOSOPHY TO WORK

INQUIRY AND ITS PLACE IN CULTURE: ESSAYS ON SCIENCE, RELIGION, LAW, LITERATURE, AND LIFE

By SUSAN HAACK

Prometheus Books

Copyright © 2013 Susan Haack
All rights reserved.

ISBN: 978-1-61614-493-7

Contents

Preface to the Expanded Edition............................................
11
Acknowledgments............................................................
15
Introduction: Putting Philosophy to Work...................................
21
1. Staying for an Answer: The Untidy Process of Groping for Truth..........
35
2. The Same, Only Different................................................
47
3. The Unity of Truth and the Plurality of Truths..........................
53
4. Coherence, Consistency, Cogency, Congruity, Cohesiveness, &c.: Remain 
Calm! Don't Go Overboard!..................................................
69
5. Not Cynicism, but Synechism: Lessons from Classical Pragmatism..........
83
6. Science, Economics, "Vision"............................................
97
7. Six Signs of Scientism..................................................
105
8. The Integrity of Science: What It Means, Why It Matters.................
121
9. Scientific Secrecy and "Spin": The Sad, Sleazy Saga of the Trials of 
Remune.....................................................................
141
10. Truth and Justice, Inquiry and Advocacy, Science and Law...............
153
11. Trial and Error: The Supreme Court's Philosophy of Science.............
165
12. Just Say "No" to Logical Negativism....................................
179
13. An Epistemologist Among the Epidemiologists............................
195
14. Fallibilism and Faith, Naturalism and the Supernatural, Science and 
Religion...................................................................
199
15. The Ideal of Intellectual Integrity, in Life and Literature............
209
16. After My Own Heart: Dorothy Sayers's Feminism..........................
221
17. Worthwhile Lives.......................................................
229
18. Why I Am Not an Oxymoron...............................................
233
19. Formal Philosophy?—A Plea for Pluralism................................
235
20. Out of Step: Academic Ethics in a Preposterous Environment.............
251
Notes......................................................................
269
Index......................................................................
319

Excerpt

CHAPTER 1

STAYING FOR AN ANSWER

The Untidy Process of Groping for Truth

Some years ago now, I heard my then-dean, a physicist by training, expresshis unease at the suggestion that the mission statement for the College ofArts and Sciences include the phrase, "concern for truth." The word makespeople nervous, he warned, and they're bound to ask, "whose 'truth'?" A sociologistcolleague, seconding the dean's reservations, remarked that, while ofcourse his research advances knowledge, he isn't concerned with "truth." Acouple of us pointed out that, unless your conclusions are true, they aren't reallyknowledge, only purported knowledge; and I did my best to explain that itdoesn't follow from the fact that people disagree about what is true that truth isrelative to perspective. But in due course a Strategic Plan for the college specifiedcurricular innovations required by the "fundamental questions" that havebeen raised "about the presumed universality and objectivity of 'truth.'"

Probably most of you have heard, not exactly this story, but other storiesessentially similar, only set in other places and with different characters; for theideas my dean had picked up are by now almost an orthodoxy in academia, takenin some quarters—admittedly, more often in the humanities and the social sciencesthan in the physics department!—as indications of intellectual sophisticationand moral rectitude.

Naturally, proponents of this new almost-orthodoxy—the "Higher Dismissiveness,"as Anthony Gottlieb calls it, or in my terminology, the "New Cynicism"—differamong themselves on the finer points. But they agree that the supposedideal of honest inquiry, respect for evidence, concern for truth, is a kind ofillusion, a smoke-screen disguising the operations of power, politics, and rhetoric;and that those of us who think it matters whether you care about the truth, whofeel no need for precautionary scare quotes when we write of fact, knowledge,evidence, etc., are hopelessly naive. As if this weren't bad enough, the feministsand multi culturalists among them suggest that in our naiveté we are complicit insexism and racism, and the sociologists and rhetoricians of science among themsuspect us of reactionary conform ism with the military-industrial complex.

Faced with such an intimidating double accusation of naiveté and moralbackward ness, many take the ostrich attitude, apparently hoping that if theyignore the New Cynicism hard enough, it will go away. But an old-fashioned priglike myself begins to feel—well, rather like the proverbial cannibal among themissionaries.

A thoughtful cannibal will notice, at the heart of the New Cynicism, a profoundintolerance of uncertainty and a deep unwillingness to accept that the lessthan perfect is a lot better than nothing at all. And so again and again true, fallibilistpremises are transmuted into false, cynical conclusions: what is accepted asknown fact is often enough no such thing, therefore, the concept of known factis ideological humbug; one's judgment of the worth of evidence depends onone's back ground beliefs, therefore, there are no objective standards of evidentialquality; science isn't sacred, therefore, it must be a kind of confidence trick;and so on.

But there's really no need to give up on the objectivity of truth, evidence,etc., provided you're fallibilist enough. What is most urgently needed is a realisticunder standing of our epistemic situation, of how complicated evidence canget and how difficult serious inquiry can be. Of course, this will be only thebeginning of the work, for then there will be the questions of the place of the scienceswithin inquiry generally, of the differences between science and literature,of the roots of relativism, and of the claim of the New Cynicism to represent theinterests of the oppressed and marginalized.

* * *___

Evidence is complex and ramifying, often confusing, ambiguous, or misleading.Think of the controversy over that four-billion-year-old meteorite discovered in1984 Antarctica, thought to have come from Mars about eleven thousand yearsago, and containing what might possibly be fossilized bacteria droppings. Somespace scientists thought this was evidence of bacterial life on Mars; others thoughtthe bacterial traces might have been picked while the meteorite was in Antarctica;and others again believed that what look like fossilized bacteria droppings mightbe merely artifacts of the instrumentation. How did they know...

Details zur Ausgabe

• Verlag: G38-Prometheus
• Erscheinungsdatum: 2013
• Sprache: Englisch
• ISBN 10: 1616144939
• ISBN 13: 9781616144937
• Einband: Taschenbuch
• Anzahl der Seiten: 346
• Kontakt zum Hersteller: Nicht verfügbar
• Verantwortliche Person: Simon and Schuster Netherlands BV; info@simonandschuster.nl; ; Herculesplein 96; Utrecht; 3584 AA; Niederlande