The Four Gospels: Commentary on the Holy Scriptures of the New Testament (1) - Hardcover

Buch 1 von 3: Commentary on the Holy Scriptures of the New Testament

Taushev, Averky

 
9781942699002: The Four Gospels: Commentary on the Holy Scriptures of the New Testament (1)

Inhaltsangabe

Writing in the tradition of biblical exegetes, such as St John Chrysostom and Blessed Theophylact of Bulgaria, the work of Archbishop Averky (Taushev) provides a commentary that is firmly grounded in the teaching of the Church, manifested in its liturgical hymnography and the works of the Holy Fathers. Analyzing all four Gospels chronologically and simultaneously, he allows readers to see the life of Christ as an unfolding narrative in accessible, direct language. Using the best of prerevolutionary Russian sources, these writings also remained abreast of developments in Western biblical scholarship, engaging with it directly and honestly. He approaches the Gospels first and foremost not as a literary work of antiquity, but as the revelation of Jesus Christ as God in the flesh. Archbishop Averky’s commentaries on the New Testament have become standard textbooks in Holy Trinity Orthodox Seminary and have been published in Russia to widespread acclaim. This present volume is the first translation of these texts into English and it is an indispensable addition to the library of every student of the Gospels.

Die Inhaltsangabe kann sich auf eine andere Ausgabe dieses Titels beziehen.

Über die Autorin bzw. den Autor

Archbishop Averky (Taushev) (1906–1976) was born in Imperial Russia and taught and served throughout Europe before being assigned to teach at the Holy Trinity Seminary in New York in 1951 and became the abbot of Holy Trinity Monastery in 1960. As abbot and rector, he was heavily involved in the formation of the seminary curriculum and the daily life of the seminarians and monks. He became well known among Orthodox Christians for his staunch defense of his Church's faith and traditions. Nicholas Kotar is a graduate of Holy Trinity Seminary and an assistant editor at Holy Trinity Publications. He is a founding member of Conquering Time, an ensemble of artists inspired by the Inklings that stages original works of storytelling and traditional music and publishes new poetry and prose. He lives in Jordanville, New York.

Auszug. © Genehmigter Nachdruck. Alle Rechte vorbehalten.

The Four Gospels

Commentary on the Holy Scriptures of the New Testament Volume I

By Averky (Taushev), Nicholas Kotar

Holy Trinity Publications

Copyright © 2015 Holy Trinity Monastery
All rights reserved.
ISBN: 978-1-942699-00-2

Contents

Preface,
Introduction: The New Testament, the Four Gospels, and a General Explanation,
1. The Coming into the World of the Lord Jesus Christ,
2. The Public Ministry of the Lord Jesus Christ: Events of His Life Before the First Passover,
3. The First Passover of the Public Ministry of the Lord Jesus Christ,
4. The Second Passover of Public Ministry of the Lord Jesus Christ,
5. The Third Passover of the Lord Jesus Christ's Public Ministry,
6. The Last Days of the Earthly Life of the Lord Jesus Christ,
7. The Resurrection of Our Lord Jesus Christ,
Sources,
Notes,
Subject Index,
Scripture Index,


CHAPTER 1

The Coming into the World of the Lord Jesus Christ


The Introduction to the Gospel: Its Veracity and Purpose

(Luke 1:1–4; John 20:31)

One may consider the introduction to the entire four-Gospel corpus to be the first four verses of the first chapter of the Gospel according to Luke, in which the Evangelist speaks of his careful investigation of all the eyewitness accounts and the purpose of writing the Gospel in the first place: that everyone may know the firm foundation of the Christian teaching. St John also adds: "that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that believing you may have life in His name" (John 20:31).

Thus, St Luke began to write his Gospel because there were already several similar accounts written that were not sufficiently authoritative or convincing in their content, and he considered it his duty to write an account of the life of the Lord Jesus Christ that was fully researched, and he considered the words of "eyewitnesses and ministers of the word" in order to uphold the faith of a certain Theophilus, and of course all Christians in general. Since St Luke himself was one of the seventy disciples of Christ, and so could not have been an eyewitness of such events as the birth of John the Baptist, the Annunciation, the birth of Christ, and the meeting of the Lord, he doubtless took a significant part of his Gospel from the words of other eyewitnesses, that is, on the basis of tradition (here we see the importance of tradition, so vehemently denounced by Protestants and other sectarians!). At the same time, it is completely self-evident that the first and most important eyewitness of the early events of the Gospel narrative was the most holy Virgin Mary, about whom St Luke twice mentions, that she treasured the memory of all these events, pondering them in her heart (Luke 2:19, 51).

There can be no doubt that the superiority of Luke's account over all those many written reports that preceded him is in the fact that he wrote only after a great deal of fact checking and in his strict chronological order. The same can be said of the other three Gospels, because two of them (John and Matthew) were written by direct eyewitnesses and "ministers of the Word" (that is, members of the Twelve) and the third, Mark's, was written based on the eyewitness account of one of the nearest disciples of Christ, St Peter.

The purpose indicated by St John is especially vividly seen throughout his own Gospel, which is full of triumphant confirmations of the divinity of the Lord Jesus Christ, but of course, the other three Gospels have the same purpose as well.


The Pre-Eternal Begetting and the Incarnation of the Son of God (John 1:1–14)

While the Evangelists Matthew and Luke tell of the earthly birth of the Lord Jesus Christ, St John begins his Gospel with a summary of the teaching on His pre-eternal begetting and Incarnation, as the only begotten Son of God. The first three Evangelists begin their accounts with events thanks to which the kingdom of God had its beginning within time and space, but St John, like an eagle, rises up to the pre-eternal foundation of this kingdom, contemplating the eternal being of the One Who only in the latter days (Heb 1:1) became man.

The second Person of the Holy Trinity, the Son of God, he names "the Word." It is important to know and remember that this "Word" (logos in Greek) means not only a word already uttered (as in English and Russian) but also the "thought, wisdom, intelligence" expressed by a given word. Thus, by calling the Son of God "the Word," St John is identifying Him with the "Wisdom" of God (Luke 11:49; Matt 23:34). The holy Apostle Paul also calls Christ "The Wisdom of God" (1 Cor 1:24). This teaching on the wisdom of God effectively identifies Christ as the Wisdom of God in the Old Testament wisdom literature, particularly the book of Proverbs (compare the incredible passage in Prov 8:22–30). Considering this, it is strange to insist, as some do, that St John took his teaching on the Logos from Plato and his followers (such as Philo). St John is writing about something that was well-known already in the Old Testament, something he was taught, as the beloved disciple, by his divine Teacher and the Holy Spirit.

"In the beginning was the Word" means that the Word is coeternal with God. Later in the sentence, St John explains that this Word is not separate from God in terms of its being, and that it is consequently one in essence with God, and, finally, he openly calls the Word "God" ("and the Word was God"). Here, the word "God" in Greek is used without the article, and this was used by the Arians and Origen as proof that the Word was not as divine as God the Father. This, however, was a misunderstanding. In fact, the lack of an article actually proves the theological axiom that the Persons of the Holy Trinity should not be confused. The article, in Greek, indicates that the subject of the sentence is identical with the subject that was spoken of previously. Thus, if St John, when speaking of the Word being God, had used an article, then he would have written a theological falsehood — that the Word is equivalent to God the Father. Thus, when he speaks of the Word, the Evangelist calls him merely theos, not ho theos, indicating thus that He is divine, but underlining at the same time that the Word has its own hypostasis, and is in no way to be confused with the hypostasis of God the Father.

As Blessed Theophylact mentions, St John calls the Son of God "the Word," not "the Son," in order to avoid thinking, incorrectly, of the begetting of the Son of God in carnal and passionate terms. "This is why he calls him 'Word,' so that you may know, that as a word is born of the mind without passion, so the Son is begotten of the Father without passion."

"All things were made through Him" does not mean that the Word was merely an instrument in the creation of the world, but that the world came from the First Principle and Cause for all creation (as well as God the Word), God the Father, through the Son, Who of Himself is the source of being for everything that came to be, with the exception of Himself and other Persons of the Godhead.

"In Him was life" — here the word "life" does not presuppose existence in the way we usually mean it, but rather the "spiritual life" that inspires all rational creatures to strive toward the Author of their existence, God. This spiritual life is given only by communion and unity with the hypostatic Word of God.

Thus, the Word is the source of true spiritual life for rational creation.

"And...

„Über diesen Titel“ kann sich auf eine andere Ausgabe dieses Titels beziehen.