Most management frameworks assume that standardized processes drive performance. Field research across thousands of managers reveals a different pattern: the highest-performing teams operate under principles that contradict conventional HR doctrine. These managers reject uniform development paths, ignore competency gaps in favor of strengths, and structure accountability in ways that formal training programs rarely address. The divergence centers on three operational choices: how managers define role expectations, how they allocate development resources, and how they structure feedback loops. In each domain, top performers prioritize individual variance over procedural consistency. They treat talent as non-fungible, refuse to correct weaknesses that fall outside core responsibilities, and build measurement systems around outcomes rather than behaviors. These choices create friction with corporate policy but consistently yield higher retention and output metrics. For organizations operating in competitive labor markets, the implications extend beyond team management. When individual manager behavior diverges systematically from institutional practice, it signals a structural misalignment between policy design and operational reality. The question is not whether to adopt these practices universally, but how to identify contexts where variance produces advantage and where standardization remains necessary.
Die Inhaltsangabe kann sich auf eine andere Ausgabe dieses Titels beziehen.
A writer of structured nonfiction that turns history, strategy, and self-improvement into useful ideas for modern readers.
„Über diesen Titel“ kann sich auf eine andere Ausgabe dieses Titels beziehen.
Anbieter: BuchWeltWeit Ludwig Meier e.K., Bergisch Gladbach, Deutschland
Taschenbuch. Zustand: Neu. This item is printed on demand - it takes 3-4 days longer - Neuware -Most management frameworks assume that standardized processes drive performance. Field research across thousands of managers reveals a different pattern: the highest-performing teams operate under principles that contradict conventional HR doctrine. These managers reject uniform development paths, ignore competency gaps in favor of strengths, and structure accountability in ways that formal training programs rarely address.The divergence centers on three operational choices: how managers define role expectations, how they allocate development resources, and how they structure feedback loops. In each domain, top performers prioritize individual variance over procedural consistency. They treat talent as non-fungible, refuse to correct weaknesses that fall outside core responsibilities, and build measurement systems around outcomes rather than behaviors. These choices create friction with corporate policy but consistently yield higher retention and output metrics.For organizations operating in competitive labor markets, the implications extend beyond team management. When individual manager behavior diverges systematically from institutional practice, it signals a structural misalignment between policy design and operational reality. The question is not whether to adopt these practices universally, but how to identify contexts where variance produces advantage and where standardization remains necessary. 276 pp. Englisch. Bestandsnummer des Verkäufers 9783565602001
Anzahl: 2 verfügbar
Anbieter: preigu, Osnabrück, Deutschland
Taschenbuch. Zustand: Neu. Breaking Convention in Management Systems | What Global Managers Know About Employee Performance That Traditional Hierarchies [.] | Soren Vale | Taschenbuch | Englisch | epubli | EAN 9783565602001 | Verantwortliche Person für die EU: Neopubli GmbH (Imprint: epubli), Köpenicker Str. 154a, 10997 Berlin, produktsicherheit[at]epubli[dot]com | Anbieter: preigu. Bestandsnummer des Verkäufers 136076147
Anzahl: 5 verfügbar