Prioritizing software requirements helps to determine which requirements are most important, and the order in which requirements should be developed and tested throughout the development life cycle. By prioritizing the requirements, software engineers can put focus on a subset of all requirements, and implement these in a particular release. This work aims to analyze two ratio scale prioritization techniques named Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Cumulative Voting (CV) by a controlled experiment, conducted on software engineering/computer science master students. The experiment was designed to compare time consumption, scalability and accuracy between the two techniques. All these evaluation parameters are combined together to find out which technique is more suitable to use when prioritizing software requirements. The results of the experiment indicate that CV is less time consuming than AHP. It was also found that CV is more scalable than AHP. Furthermore, CV is regarded as more accurate than AHP when measured subjectively in post-test.
Die Inhaltsangabe kann sich auf eine andere Ausgabe dieses Titels beziehen.
The author is a software professional with experience of researchin software engineering and Human Computer Interaction projects.He holds a Master Degree in Software Engineering and he iscurrently working as a Researcher.
„Über diesen Titel“ kann sich auf eine andere Ausgabe dieses Titels beziehen.
Anbieter: BuchWeltWeit Ludwig Meier e.K., Bergisch Gladbach, Deutschland
Taschenbuch. Zustand: Neu. This item is printed on demand - it takes 3-4 days longer - Neuware -Prioritizing software requirements helps to determine which requirements are most important, and the order in which requirements should be developed and tested throughout the development life cycle. By prioritizing the requirements, software engineers can put focus on a subset of all requirements, and implement these in a particular release. This work aims to analyze two ratio scale prioritization techniques named Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Cumulative Voting (CV) by a controlled experiment, conducted on software engineering/computer science master students. The experiment was designed to compare time consumption, scalability and accuracy between the two techniques. All these evaluation parameters are combined together to find out which technique is more suitable to use when prioritizing software requirements. The results of the experiment indicate that CV is less time consuming than AHP. It was also found that CV is more scalable than AHP. Furthermore, CV is regarded as more accurate than AHP when measured subjectively in post-test. 80 pp. Englisch. Bestandsnummer des Verkäufers 9783838313771
Anzahl: 2 verfügbar
Anbieter: moluna, Greven, Deutschland
Zustand: New. Dieser Artikel ist ein Print on Demand Artikel und wird nach Ihrer Bestellung fuer Sie gedruckt. Prioritizing software requirements helps to determine which requirements are most important, and the order in which requirements should be developed and tested throughout the development life cycle. By prioritizing the requirements, software engineers can p. Bestandsnummer des Verkäufers 5412070
Anzahl: Mehr als 20 verfügbar
Anbieter: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Deutschland
Taschenbuch. Zustand: Neu. nach der Bestellung gedruckt Neuware - Printed after ordering - Prioritizing software requirements helps to determine which requirements are most important, and the order in which requirements should be developed and tested throughout the development life cycle. By prioritizing the requirements, software engineers can put focus on a subset of all requirements, and implement these in a particular release. This work aims to analyze two ratio scale prioritization techniques named Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Cumulative Voting (CV) by a controlled experiment, conducted on software engineering/computer science master students. The experiment was designed to compare time consumption, scalability and accuracy between the two techniques. All these evaluation parameters are combined together to find out which technique is more suitable to use when prioritizing software requirements. The results of the experiment indicate that CV is less time consuming than AHP. It was also found that CV is more scalable than AHP. Furthermore, CV is regarded as more accurate than AHP when measured subjectively in post-test. Bestandsnummer des Verkäufers 9783838313771
Anzahl: 1 verfügbar
Anbieter: buchversandmimpf2000, Emtmannsberg, BAYE, Deutschland
Taschenbuch. Zustand: Neu. This item is printed on demand - Print on Demand Titel. Neuware -Prioritizing software requirements helps to determine which requirements are most important, and the order in which requirements should be developed and tested throughout the development life cycle. By prioritizing the requirements, software engineers can put focus on a subset of all requirements, and implement these in a particular release. This work aims to analyze two ratio scale prioritization techniques named Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Cumulative Voting (CV) by a controlled experiment, conducted on software engineering/computer science master students. The experiment was designed to compare time consumption, scalability and accuracy between the two techniques. All these evaluation parameters are combined together to find out which technique is more suitable to use when prioritizing software requirements. The results of the experiment indicate that CV is less time consuming than AHP. It was also found that CV is more scalable than AHP. Furthermore, CV is regarded as more accurate than AHP when measured subjectively in post-test.VDM Verlag, Dudweiler Landstraße 99, 66123 Saarbrücken 80 pp. Englisch. Bestandsnummer des Verkäufers 9783838313771
Anzahl: 1 verfügbar
Anbieter: Mispah books, Redhill, SURRE, Vereinigtes Königreich
Paperback. Zustand: Like New. LIKE NEW. SHIPS FROM MULTIPLE LOCATIONS. book. Bestandsnummer des Verkäufers ERICA79038383137716
Anzahl: 1 verfügbar