Absolute Truth 3.1. Dieser Artikel ist nicht verfügbar.Absolute Truth 3.1

What if there was an ancient manuscript composed 3000 + years ago which could link to the methods and means of modern office dynamics and situations? Could this mysterious record relate a parallel script of ancient priest’s duties; yet, be an algorithm containing interpersonal relationships within the rank and file of current corporate offices? Could this antediluvian enigma between priests serving in an ancient tabernacle devoted to their God, also be a parallel account detailing an allegiance toward today’s employment in our business world? Could you call this parallel account between a priest’s service and a post within a contemporary office a sculpted facsimile, an analogy, a prototype or maybe, a paradigm? Subsequently, we could use all these words in describing this dissimilarity of similarities, disparity of parities or departure from the past which converges with the present. Maybe we could presume that this baffling document from antiquity has a unique distinction with connection from different eras, ancient past and future present? Or, better yet, how could any text from the antiquated past be a model containing an association to and including our present progressive time?