daniel greco (33 Ergebnisse)

PAP. Zustand: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000.

PAP. Zustand: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000.

Hardcover. Zustand: Very Good. VERY GOOD hardcover, no marks in text, tight binding, clean exterior. Book.

Zustand: Muy bueno. : Este libro, titulado 'Collection on Laparoscopy in Bariatrics', es una recopilación de conocimientos sobre laparoscopia en el campo de la cirugía bariátrica. Publicado por Endo-Press en 2010, este libro de tapa dura ofrece una visión detallada y práctica de las técnicas y procedimientos laparoscópicos utilizados en el tratamiento de la obesidad. Con contribuciones de expertos como Karl Miller, Hans Lönroth y Matthias Kemen, entre otros, es una valiosa fuente de información para profesionales de la salud interesados en esta área. EAN: 9783897565371 Tipo: Libros Categoría: Salud y Bienestar|Ciencias Título: Collection on Laparoscopy in Bariatrics Autor: Karl Miller| Hans Lönroth| Matthias Kemen| Gerasimos Tzivras| J C Ruiz de Adana| J Lopez-Herrero| A Hernandez-Matias| Daniel Krawczykowski| Roberto M Tacchino| Francesco Greco| Daniele Matera| Holger Till| Susann Blüher| Friedrich Gagstatter Editorial: Endo-Press Idioma: N Formato: tapa dura.

Paperback. Zustand: Brand New. 1st edition. 280 pages. 9.25x6.00x0.50 inches. In Stock.

Paperback. Zustand: New.

Zustand: New.

HRD. Zustand: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000.

HRD. Zustand: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000.

Zustand: As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Zustand: new.

Zustand: New.

Hardcover. Zustand: Brand New. 208 pages. 9.45x6.46x0.79 inches. In Stock.

Zustand: NEW.

Zustand: As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Hardback. Zustand: New. New copy - Usually dispatched within 4 working days.

Hardcover. Zustand: new. Hardcover. It's standard in epistemology to approach questions about knowledge and rational belief using idealized, simplified models. But while the practice of constructing idealized models in epistemology is old, metaepistemological reflection on that practice is not. Greco argues that the fact that epistemologists build idealized models isn't merely a metaepistemological observation that can leave first-order epistemological debates untouched. Rather, once we viewepistemology through the lens of idealization and model-building, the landscape looks quite different.Constructing idealized models is likely the best epistemologists can do. Once onestarts using epistemological categories like belief, knowledge, and confidence, the realm of idealization and model-building is entered. We can object to a model of knowledge by pointing to a better model, but in the absence of a better model, the fact that a framework for epistemologizing theorizing involves simplifications, approximations, and other inaccuracies-the fact of its status as an idealized model-is not in itself objectionable. Once we accept that theorizing inepistemological terms is inescapably idealized, a number of intriguing possibilities open up. Greco defends a package of epistemological views that might otherwise have looked indefensibly dismissiveof our cognitive limitations-a package according to which we know a wide variety of facts with certainty, including what our evidence is, what we know and don't know, and what follows from our knowledge. Daniel Greco argues that the landscape of epistemology looks quite different when viewed through the lens of idealization and model-building. We should accept that theorizing in epistemological terms is inescapably idealized, and that we can know a wide variety of facts with certainty despite our cognitive limitations. Shipping may be from multiple locations in the US or from the UK, depending on stock availability.

Hardcover. Zustand: New.

Zustand: New. In.

Hardcover. Zustand: Fine. Zustand des Schutzumschlags: Very Good. 6th edition ; 680 p. : col. ill., col. maps; 29 cm. ; ISBN: 0276420225; 9780276420221 LCCN: 93-139281 ; LC: DA650; Q941/T/1990; Dewey: 914.104/859 ; OCLC: 28425381 ; blue and black cloth with gold designs ; in gold filigree slipcase ; wear on edges of slipcase ; fold out maps of England ; Contents: Treasures in their time -- Gazetteer of the treasures of Britain -- Famous people -- Map Section -- Gazetteer of the treasures of Ireland -- Collections index -- 1000 years of design -- The language of experts ; "he most comprehensive illustrated guide to the art, architecture, and history of Britain ever produced. Written by a prestigious team of expert authors, Treasures of Britain includes over 2,000 alphabetical entries that describe England's heritage and landscape, from medieval churches and cathedrals to historic castles and stunning gardens. Lavishly illustrated with over 1,500 color photographs, this is an unrivaled volume, a classic source of information on Britain's past and present." ; includes sections on Robert Burns, Bath, Cambridge, Fitzwilliam Museum, Canterbury Cathedral, Coventry Cathedral, Thomas Hardy, Dover Castle, Dunstable, Durham Cathedral, Ely Cathedral, Mary Queen of Scots, Glasgow Art Galleries and Museum, Greenwich, Elizabeth I, Hever Castle, Samuel Johnson, Usher Gallery Lincoln, Treasures of Liverpool, London, Duke of Wellington, Tower of London, Westminster Abbey, British Museum, Montacute House, Ashmolean Museum, Oxford University, Peterborough Cathedral, Francis Drake, Nelson, St Alban's Abbey, William Shakrespeare, Warwick Castle, Wells Cathedral, Wilton House, Windsor Castle, Edward Elgar, Worcester Cathedral, The Kit-Cat Club, Rebels and Reformers, The Abbey Theatre, The Dublin Dramatists, William Butler Yeats, Chester Beatty Library ; FINE/VG. Book.

Hardback. Zustand: New. It's standard in epistemology to approach questions about knowledge and rational belief using idealized, simplified models. But while the practice of constructing idealized models in epistemology is old, metaepistemological reflection on that practice is not. Greco argues that the fact that epistemologists build idealized models isn't merely a metaepistemological observation that can leave first-order epistemological debates untouched. Rather, once we view epistemology through the lens of idealization and model-building, the landscape looks quite different.Constructing idealized models is likely the best epistemologists can do. Once one starts using epistemological categories like belief, knowledge, and confidence, the realm of idealization and model-building is entered. We can object to a model of knowledge by pointing to a better model, but in the absence of a better model, the fact that a framework for epistemologizing theorizing involves simplifications, approximations, and other inaccuracies-the fact of its status as an idealized model-is not in itself objectionable. Once we accept that theorizing in epistemological terms is inescapably idealized, a number of intriguing possibilities open up. Greco defends a package of epistemological views that might otherwise have looked indefensibly dismissive of our cognitive limitations-a package according to which we know a wide variety of facts with certainty, including what our evidence is, what we know and don't know, and what follows from our knowledge.

Zustand: New. 2023. Hardcover. . . . . .

Zustand: NEW.

Zustand: New. 2023. Hardcover. . . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland.

Hardcover. Zustand: Brand New. 208 pages. 9.45x6.46x0.79 inches. In Stock.

Hardcover. Zustand: new. Hardcover. It's standard in epistemology to approach questions about knowledge and rational belief using idealized, simplified models. But while the practice of constructing idealized models in epistemology is old, metaepistemological reflection on that practice is not. Greco argues that the fact that epistemologists build idealized models isn't merely a metaepistemological observation that can leave first-order epistemological debates untouched. Rather, once we viewepistemology through the lens of idealization and model-building, the landscape looks quite different.Constructing idealized models is likely the best epistemologists can do. Once onestarts using epistemological categories like belief, knowledge, and confidence, the realm of idealization and model-building is entered. We can object to a model of knowledge by pointing to a better model, but in the absence of a better model, the fact that a framework for epistemologizing theorizing involves simplifications, approximations, and other inaccuracies-the fact of its status as an idealized model-is not in itself objectionable. Once we accept that theorizing inepistemological terms is inescapably idealized, a number of intriguing possibilities open up. Greco defends a package of epistemological views that might otherwise have looked indefensibly dismissiveof our cognitive limitations-a package according to which we know a wide variety of facts with certainty, including what our evidence is, what we know and don't know, and what follows from our knowledge. Daniel Greco argues that the landscape of epistemology looks quite different when viewed through the lens of idealization and model-building. We should accept that theorizing in epistemological terms is inescapably idealized, and that we can know a wide variety of facts with certainty despite our cognitive limitations. Shipping may be from our UK warehouse or from our Australian or US warehouses, depending on stock availability.

Buch. Zustand: Neu. Neuware - Daniel Greco argues that the landscape of epistemology looks quite different when viewed through the lens of idealization and model-building. We should accept that theorizing in epistemological terms is inescapably idealized, and that we can know a wide variety of facts with certainty despite our cognitive limitations.

Hardcover. Zustand: new. Hardcover. It's standard in epistemology to approach questions about knowledge and rational belief using idealized, simplified models. But while the practice of constructing idealized models in epistemology is old, metaepistemological reflection on that practice is not. Greco argues that the fact that epistemologists build idealized models isn't merely a metaepistemological observation that can leave first-order epistemological debates untouched. Rather, once we viewepistemology through the lens of idealization and model-building, the landscape looks quite different.Constructing idealized models is likely the best epistemologists can do. Once onestarts using epistemological categories like belief, knowledge, and confidence, the realm of idealization and model-building is entered. We can object to a model of knowledge by pointing to a better model, but in the absence of a better model, the fact that a framework for epistemologizing theorizing involves simplifications, approximations, and other inaccuracies-the fact of its status as an idealized model-is not in itself objectionable. Once we accept that theorizing inepistemological terms is inescapably idealized, a number of intriguing possibilities open up. Greco defends a package of epistemological views that might otherwise have looked indefensibly dismissiveof our cognitive limitations-a package according to which we know a wide variety of facts with certainty, including what our evidence is, what we know and don't know, and what follows from our knowledge. Daniel Greco argues that the landscape of epistemology looks quite different when viewed through the lens of idealization and model-building. We should accept that theorizing in epistemological terms is inescapably idealized, and that we can know a wide variety of facts with certainty despite our cognitive limitations. Shipping may be from our Sydney, NSW warehouse or from our UK or US warehouse, depending on stock availability.

Hardback. Zustand: New. It's standard in epistemology to approach questions about knowledge and rational belief using idealized, simplified models. But while the practice of constructing idealized models in epistemology is old, metaepistemological reflection on that practice is not. Greco argues that the fact that epistemologists build idealized models isn't merely a metaepistemological observation that can leave first-order epistemological debates untouched. Rather, once we view epistemology through the lens of idealization and model-building, the landscape looks quite different.Constructing idealized models is likely the best epistemologists can do. Once one starts using epistemological categories like belief, knowledge, and confidence, the realm of idealization and model-building is entered. We can object to a model of knowledge by pointing to a better model, but in the absence of a better model, the fact that a framework for epistemologizing theorizing involves simplifications, approximations, and other inaccuracies-the fact of its status as an idealized model-is not in itself objectionable. Once we accept that theorizing in epistemological terms is inescapably idealized, a number of intriguing possibilities open up. Greco defends a package of epistemological views that might otherwise have looked indefensibly dismissive of our cognitive limitations-a package according to which we know a wide variety of facts with certainty, including what our evidence is, what we know and don't know, and what follows from our knowledge.

Hardcover. Zustand: New.