Verlag: Oxford University Press OUP, 2015
ISBN 10: 0199685789 ISBN 13: 9780199685783
Sprache: Englisch
Anbieter: Books Puddle, New York, NY, USA
EUR 118,41
Währung umrechnenAnzahl: 1 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbZustand: New. pp. 320.
EUR 125,53
Währung umrechnenAnzahl: 1 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbZustand: New. pp. 320.
EUR 122,10
Währung umrechnenAnzahl: 1 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbZustand: New. pp. 320.
Anbieter: GreatBookPrices, Columbia, MD, USA
EUR 125,38
Währung umrechnenAnzahl: Mehr als 20 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbZustand: New.
Anbieter: Best Price, Torrance, CA, USA
EUR 119,82
Währung umrechnenAnzahl: 2 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbZustand: New. SUPER FAST SHIPPING.
Anbieter: GreatBookPricesUK, Woodford Green, Vereinigtes Königreich
EUR 141,54
Währung umrechnenAnzahl: Mehr als 20 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbZustand: New.
Anbieter: THE SAINT BOOKSTORE, Southport, Vereinigtes Königreich
EUR 150,36
Währung umrechnenAnzahl: 15 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbHardback. Zustand: New. New copy - Usually dispatched within 4 working days. 668.
Verlag: Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2015
ISBN 10: 0199685789 ISBN 13: 9780199685783
Sprache: Englisch
Anbieter: CitiRetail, Stevenage, Vereinigtes Königreich
EUR 165,94
Währung umrechnenAnzahl: 1 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbHardcover. Zustand: new. Hardcover. You find yourself in a court of law, accused of having hit someone. What can you do to avoid conviction? You could simply deny the accusation: 'No, I didn't do it'. But suppose you did do it. You may then give a different answer. 'Yes, I hit him', you grant, 'but it was self-defence'; or 'Yes, but I was acting under duress'. To answer in this way-to offer a 'Yes, but. . .' reply-is to hold that your particular wrong was committed in exceptionalcircumstances. Perhaps it is true that, as a rule, wrongdoers ought to be convicted. But in your case the court should set the rule aside. You should be acquitted. Within limits, the law allows forexceptions. Or so we tend to think. In fact, the line between rules and exceptions is harder to draw than it seems. How are we to determine what counts as an exception and what as part of the relevant rule? The distinction has important practical implications. But legal theorists have found the notion of an exception surprisingly difficult to explain. This is the longstanding jurisprudential problem that this book seeks to solve. The book is divided into three parts.Part I, Defeasibility in Question, introduces the topic and articulates the core puzzle of defeasibility in law. Part II, Defeasibility in Theory, develops a comprehensive proof-based account of legalexceptions. Part III, Defeasibility in Action, looks more closely into the workings of exceptions in accusatory contexts, including the criminal trial. Within limits, the law allows for exceptions. But how do we draw the line between a rule and its exceptions? This is a long-debated question with important practical consequences, but legal theorists have found it surprisingly difficult to answer. This book tackles this persistent puzzle by offering a new account of exceptions in the law. Shipping may be from our UK warehouse or from our Australian or US warehouses, depending on stock availability.
Anbieter: Revaluation Books, Exeter, Vereinigtes Königreich
EUR 188,48
Währung umrechnenAnzahl: 2 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbHardcover. Zustand: Brand New. 1st edition. 320 pages. 9.25x6.25x0.75 inches. In Stock.
Verlag: Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2015
ISBN 10: 0199685789 ISBN 13: 9780199685783
Sprache: Englisch
Anbieter: Grand Eagle Retail, Mason, OH, USA
EUR 152,52
Währung umrechnenAnzahl: 1 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbHardcover. Zustand: new. Hardcover. You find yourself in a court of law, accused of having hit someone. What can you do to avoid conviction? You could simply deny the accusation: 'No, I didn't do it'. But suppose you did do it. You may then give a different answer. 'Yes, I hit him', you grant, 'but it was self-defence'; or 'Yes, but I was acting under duress'. To answer in this way-to offer a 'Yes, but. . .' reply-is to hold that your particular wrong was committed in exceptionalcircumstances. Perhaps it is true that, as a rule, wrongdoers ought to be convicted. But in your case the court should set the rule aside. You should be acquitted. Within limits, the law allows forexceptions. Or so we tend to think. In fact, the line between rules and exceptions is harder to draw than it seems. How are we to determine what counts as an exception and what as part of the relevant rule? The distinction has important practical implications. But legal theorists have found the notion of an exception surprisingly difficult to explain. This is the longstanding jurisprudential problem that this book seeks to solve. The book is divided into three parts.Part I, Defeasibility in Question, introduces the topic and articulates the core puzzle of defeasibility in law. Part II, Defeasibility in Theory, develops a comprehensive proof-based account of legalexceptions. Part III, Defeasibility in Action, looks more closely into the workings of exceptions in accusatory contexts, including the criminal trial. Within limits, the law allows for exceptions. But how do we draw the line between a rule and its exceptions? This is a long-debated question with important practical consequences, but legal theorists have found it surprisingly difficult to answer. This book tackles this persistent puzzle by offering a new account of exceptions in the law. Shipping may be from multiple locations in the US or from the UK, depending on stock availability.
Anbieter: Brook Bookstore On Demand, Napoli, NA, Italien
EUR 118,87
Währung umrechnenAnzahl: Mehr als 20 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbZustand: new. Questo è un articolo print on demand.