Isbn: 9780816657650 - scientific explanation: volume 13 (minnesota studies in the philosophy of science) (9 Ergebnisse)

Soft cover. Zustand: Acceptable. Soft cover book in acceptable condition. Book contains highlighting and notes and underlining in pen throughout. (Pen notes do not obscure text). A good resource copy. Questions welcome. We ship internationally from the United States and Canada every week. If buying internationally, please be aware that additional charges may apply for heavier books. We guarantee a safe, quick, and secure transaction. 10+ years in online bookselling experience.…

Paperback. Zustand: Brand New. minnesota archive editions edition. 544 pages. 9.00x6.13x1.36 inches. In Stock.

PAP. Zustand: New. New Book. Delivered from our UK warehouse in 4 to 14 business days. THIS BOOK IS PRINTED ON DEMAND. Established seller since 2000.

Zustand: New. Print on Demand pp. 544.

Zustand: New. Print on Demand pp. 544.

Zustand: New. PRINT ON DEMAND pp. 544.

Zustand: New. Dieser Artikel ist ein Print on Demand Artikel und wird nach Ihrer Bestellung fuer Sie gedruckt. &Uumlber den AutorPhilip Kitcher and Wesley C. Salmon, EditorsKlappentextrnrnScientific Explanation was first published in 1962. Minnesota Archive Editions uses digital technology to make long-unavailable books once .…

Taschenbuch. Zustand: Neu. Scientific Explanation | Philip Kitcher | Taschenbuch | Englisch | University of Minnesota Press | EAN 9780816657650 | Verantwortliche Person für die EU: Libri GmbH, Europaallee 1, 36244 Bad Hersfeld, gpsr[at]libri[dot]de | Anbieter: preigu Print on Demand.

Taschenbuch. Zustand: Neu. nach der Bestellung gedruckt Neuware - Printed after ordering - Scientific Explanation was first published in 1962. Minnesota Archive Editions uses digital technology to make long-unavailable books once again accessible, and are published unaltered from the original University of Minnesota Press editions.Is a new consensus emerging in the philosophy of science The nine distinguished contributors to this volume apply that question to the realm of scientific explanation and, although their conclusions vary, they agree in one respect: there definitely was an old consensus.Co-editor Wesley Salmon's opening essay, 'Four Decades of Scientific Explanation,' grounds the entire discussion. His point of departure is the founding document of the old consensus: a 1948 paper by Carl G. Hempel and Paul Oppenheim, 'Studies in the Logic of Explanation,' that set forth, with remarkable clarity, a mode of argument that came to be known as the deductive-nomological model. This approach, holding that explanation dies not move beyond the sphere of empirical knowledge, remained dominant during the hegemony of logical empiricism from 1950 to 1975. Salmon traces in detail the rise and breakup of the old consensus, and examines the degree to which there is, if not a new consensus, at least a kind of reconciliation on this issue among contemporary philosophers of science and clear agreement that science can indeed tell us why.The other contributors, in the order of their presentations, are: Peter Railton, Matti Sintonen, Paul W. Humphreys, David Papineau, Nancy Cartwright, James Woodward, Merrilee H. Salmon, and Philip Kitcher.…