9783528080839 - Analysis of Laminar Flow over a Backward Facing Step (Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics): A GAMM Workshop (Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary... (13 Ergebnisse)

Zustand: As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Zustand: New. In.

PF. Zustand: New.

Zustand: New.

Zustand: New. Num Pages: 420 pages, Ill. BIC Classification: PHD; PHU; TGB; TGMF2. Category: (P) Professional & Vocational. Dimension: 230 x 156 x 22. Weight in Grams: 594. . 1984. Hardback. . . . .

Zustand: New. pp. 428.

Kartoniert / Broschiert. Zustand: New.

Zustand: New. Num Pages: 420 pages, Ill. BIC Classification: PHD; PHU; TGB; TGMF2. Category: (P) Professional & Vocational. Dimension: 230 x 156 x 22. Weight in Grams: 594. . 1984. Hardback. . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland.

Taschenbuch. Zustand: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - ~~~~ INTRODUCTION 1. - The problem for analysis and requirements 2. - Results 3. - Comparison of computer times 4. - Conclusion. INTRODUCTION In 1981 it appeared to the organizers that a workshop to compare codes to solve the Navier -Stokes equations would be of great interest to the community of numerical analysts and users working on CFD (Computer fluid Dynamics}. A test problem would have to be selected with the following features : 1. it should be suited for all known methods (finite differences, finite elements, spectral . ) thus the geometry should be simple. 2. it should be simple so that scientists with small computer facilities can test it and the gradients in the flow should be reasonable in size so that algo rithms don't blow up with a limited number of points and iterations. In practice one would have to select a stationary flow at moderate Reynolds number. 3. it should be a real flow to allow experimental ~asurements. The simplest problem used previously was the cavity flow problem ; however the singularity of the data at the boundary (point A and B on figure 1} makes it difficult for the Finite Element and Spectral methods ; furthermore it is not such an easy experiment to set up. A B . u = 2 Flow around a cylinder, although most interesting of all, is too difficult because it is unbounded (many grid points) and very quickly unsteady {Re ~30).

Taschenbuch. Zustand: Neu. This item is printed on demand - it takes 3-4 days longer - Neuware -~~~~ INTRODUCTION 1. - The problem for analysis and requirements 2. - Results 3. - Comparison of computer times 4. - Conclusion. INTRODUCTION In 1981 it appeared to the organizers that a workshop to compare codes to solve the Navier -Stokes equations would be of great interest to the community of numerical analysts and users working on CFD (Computer fluid Dynamics}. A test problem would have to be selected with the following features : 1. it should be suited for all known methods (finite differences, finite elements, spectral . ) thus the geometry should be simple. 2. it should be simple so that scientists with small computer facilities can test it and the gradients in the flow should be reasonable in size so that algo rithms don't blow up with a limited number of points and iterations. In practice one would have to select a stationary flow at moderate Reynolds number. 3. it should be a real flow to allow experimental ~asurements. The simplest problem used previously was the cavity flow problem ; however the singularity of the data at the boundary (point A and B on figure 1} makes it difficult for the Finite Element and Spectral methods ; furthermore it is not such an easy experiment to set up. A B . u = 2 Flow around a cylinder, although most interesting of all, is too difficult because it is unbounded (many grid points) and very quickly unsteady {Re ~30). 420 pp. Deutsch.

Zustand: New. Print on Demand pp. 428 49:B&W 6.14 x 9.21 in or 234 x 156 mm (Royal 8vo) Perfect Bound on White w/Gloss Lam.

Zustand: New. PRINT ON DEMAND pp. 428.

Taschenbuch. Zustand: Neu. This item is printed on demand - Print on Demand Titel. Neuware -~~~~ INTRODUCTION 1. - The problem for analysis and requirements 2. - Results 3. - Comparison of computer times 4. - Conclusion. INTRODUCTION In 1981 it appeared to the organizers that a workshop to compare codes to solve the Navier -Stokes equations would be of great interest to the community of numerical analysts and users working on CFD (Computer fluid Dynamics}. A test problem would have to be selected with the following features : 1. it should be suited for all known methods (finite differences, finite elements, spectral . ) thus the geometry should be simple. 2. it should be simple so that scientists with small computer facilities can test it and the gradients in the flow should be reasonable in size so that algo rithms don't blow up with a limited number of points and iterations. In practice one would have to select a stationary flow at moderate Reynolds number. 3. it should be a real flow to allow experimental ~asurements. The simplest problem used previously was the cavity flow problem ; however the singularity of the data at the boundary (point A and B on figure 1} makes it difficult for the Finite Element and Spectral methods ; furthermore it is not such an easy experiment to set up. A B . u = 2 Flow around a cylinder, although most interesting of all, is too difficult because it is unbounded (many grid points) and very quickly unsteady {Re ~30).Springer Vieweg in Springer Science + Business Media, Abraham-Lincoln-Straße 46, 65189 Wiesbaden 428 pp. Deutsch.