9783790803501 - paradoxical effects of social behavior: essays in honor of anatol rapoport (11 Ergebnisse)

gebundene Ausgabe. Zustand: Gut. 341 Seiten Das hier angebotene Buch stammt aus einer teilaufgelösten wissenschaftlichen Bibliothek und trägt die entsprechenden Kennzeichnungen (Rückenschild, Instituts-Stempel.). Schnitt und Einband sind etwas staubschmutzig; Einbandkanten sind leicht bestossen; der Buchzustand ist ansonsten ordentlich und dem Alter entsprechend gut. Sprache: Englisch Gewicht in Gramm: 700.…

Hardcover. Zustand: Gut. 341 S. Ehem. Bibliotheksexemplar mit Signatur und Stempel. GUTER Zustand, ein paar Gebrauchsspuren. Ex-library with stamp and library-signature. GOOD condition, some traces of use. 3790803502 Sprache: Englisch Gewicht in Gramm: 550.

Hardcover. 1986. XVI, 341 S. : 1 Ill. ; 25 cm Hardcover edition. Very good condition. Slight traces of storage or use. 9783790803501 Sprache: Englisch Gewicht in Gramm: 721.

Zustand: New. In.

Zustand: New.

Paperback. Zustand: Brand New. 360 pages. 9.61x6.69x0.82 inches. In Stock.

Paperback. Zustand: Very Good. Dust Jacket may NOT BE INCLUDED.CDs may be missing. SHIPS FROM MULTIPLE LOCATIONS. book.

Taschenbuch. Zustand: Neu. This item is printed on demand - it takes 3-4 days longer - Neuware -In the history of science 'paradoxes' are not only amusing puzzles and chal lenges to the human mind but also driving forces of scientific development. The notion of 'paradox' is intimately related to the notion of 'contradiction'. Logi cal paradoxes allow for the derivation of contradictory propositions (e.g. 'Rus sell's set of all sets not being members of themselves' or the ancient problem with propositions like 'I am lying' 1), normative paradoxes deal with contradic tions among equally well accepted normative postulates (Arrow's 'impossibility theorem', Sen's 'Impossibility of a Paretian Liberal') and 'factual' paradoxes refer to conflicts between conventional opinion based on an accepted empirical theory and contradictory empirical evidence (e.g. the 'St. Petersburg paradox' or the 'Allais paradox' in decision theory2). Paradoxes, either logical, normative or factual, also contradict our intui tions. The counter-intuitive property which seems to be a common feature of all paradoxes plays an important part in the empirical social sciences, particularly in the old research tradition of scrutinizing the unintended consequences of pur posive actions. Expectations based on naive theories ignoring interdependencies between individual actions are very often in conflict with 'surprising' empirical evidence on collective results of social behavior. Examples are numerous reach ing from panic situations, the individual struggle for status gains resulting in collective deprivation, the less than optimal supply of collective goods etc. to global problems of the armament race and mismanagement of common resources. 360 pp. Englisch.…

Taschenbuch. Zustand: Neu. nach der Bestellung gedruckt Neuware - Printed after ordering - In the history of science 'paradoxes' are not only amusing puzzles and chal lenges to the human mind but also driving forces of scientific development. The notion of 'paradox' is intimately related to the notion of 'contradiction'. Logi cal paradoxes allow for the derivation of contradictory propositions (e.g. 'Rus sell's set of all sets not being members of themselves' or the ancient problem with propositions like 'I am lying' 1), normative paradoxes deal with contradic tions among equally well accepted normative postulates (Arrow's 'impossibility theorem', Sen's 'Impossibility of a Paretian Liberal') and 'factual' paradoxes refer to conflicts between conventional opinion based on an accepted empirical theory and contradictory empirical evidence (e.g. the 'St. Petersburg paradox' or the 'Allais paradox' in decision theory2). Paradoxes, either logical, normative or factual, also contradict our intui tions. The counter-intuitive property which seems to be a common feature of all paradoxes plays an important part in the empirical social sciences, particularly in the old research tradition of scrutinizing the unintended consequences of pur posive actions. Expectations based on naive theories ignoring interdependencies between individual actions are very often in conflict with 'surprising' empirical evidence on collective results of social behavior. Examples are numerous reach ing from panic situations, the individual struggle for status gains resulting in collective deprivation, the less than optimal supply of collective goods etc. to global problems of the armament race and mismanagement of common resources.…

Taschenbuch. Zustand: Neu. Paradoxical Effects of Social Behavior | Essays in Honor of Anatol Rapoport | A. Diekmann (u. a.) | Taschenbuch | XVI | Englisch | 1986 | Physica | EAN 9783790803501 | Verantwortliche Person für die EU: Physica Verlag in Springer Science + Business Media, Tiergartenstr. 15-17, 69121 Heidelberg, juergen[dot]hartmann[at]springer[dot]com | Anbieter: preigu Print on Demand. …

Taschenbuch. Zustand: Neu. This item is printed on demand - Print on Demand Titel. Neuware -In the history of science 'paradoxes' are not only amusing puzzles and chal lenges to the human mind but also driving forces of scientific development. The notion of 'paradox' is intimately related to the notion of 'contradiction'. Logi cal paradoxes allow for the derivation of contradictory propositions (e.g. 'Rus sell's set of all sets not being members of themselves' or the ancient problem with propositions like 'I am lying' 1), normative paradoxes deal with contradic tions among equally well accepted normative postulates (Arrow's 'impossibility theorem', Sen's 'Impossibility of a Paretian Liberal') and 'factual' paradoxes refer to conflicts between conventional opinion based on an accepted empirical theory and contradictory empirical evidence (e.g. the 'St. Petersburg paradox' or the 'Allais paradox' in decision theory2). Paradoxes, either logical, normative or factual, also contradict our intui tions. The counter-intuitive property which seems to be a common feature of all paradoxes plays an important part in the empirical social sciences, particularly in the old research tradition of scrutinizing the unintended consequences of pur posive actions. Expectations based on naive theories ignoring interdependencies between individual actions are very often in conflict with 'surprising' empirical evidence on collective results of social behavior. Examples are numerous reach ing from panic situations, the individual struggle for status gains resulting in collective deprivation, the less than optimal supply of collective goods etc. to global problems of the armament race and mismanagement of common resources.Physica Verlag, Tiergartenstr. 17, 69121 Heidelberg 360 pp. Englisch.…