Anbieter: Booksavers of Virginia, Harrisonburg, VA, USA
EUR 12,76
Währung umrechnenAnzahl: 1 verfügbar
In den Warenkorbhardcover. Zustand: Very Good. Signed. In very good, unmarked condition. Dedication written on the dedication page. Potential author's signature (first name only). No DJ. Your purchase benefits the world-wide relief efforts of Mennonite Central Committee.
Anbieter: Ria Christie Collections, Uxbridge, Vereinigtes Königreich
EUR 92,69
Währung umrechnenAnzahl: Mehr als 20 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbZustand: New. In.
EUR 76,34
Währung umrechnenAnzahl: 1 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbCasebound Hardcover. Like new 372 pp.
Anbieter: Mispah books, Redhill, SURRE, Vereinigtes Königreich
EUR 170,84
Währung umrechnenAnzahl: 1 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbHardcover. Zustand: Like New. Like New. book.
Anbieter: THE SAINT BOOKSTORE, Southport, Vereinigtes Königreich
EUR 105,48
Währung umrechnenAnzahl: Mehr als 20 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbHardback. Zustand: New. This item is printed on demand. New copy - Usually dispatched within 5-9 working days 730.
Anbieter: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Deutschland
EUR 143,70
Währung umrechnenAnzahl: 1 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbBuch. Zustand: Neu. nach der Bestellung gedruckt Neuware - Printed after ordering - In Common Grounds without Foundations, David Kratz Mathies offers an alternative, fallibilist model of moral reasoning rooted in the American Pragmatic tradition. Additional resources drawn from Chinese philosophy, Jain epistemology, modern philosophy of mathematics, and the Gadamerian hermeneutical tradition serve both to corroborate the argumentation and to provide examples of continuities in reasoning that cross the boundaries of disparate traditions. Ironically, the very success of arguments for the tradition-dependent nature of rationality belies their conclusions-even religious claims make their appeal with some level of public reason-and a nonfoundationalist theory of knowledge more accurately reflects both our scientific progress and our projects of everyday enquiry. Ultimately, an analysis of our best epistemic practices provides us with prima facie biases in favor of both diversity and free speech (without the need to appeal to any tradition-dependent axioms like inherent worth, human dignity, or the possession of a soul)-to be concretized in institutions like human rights and democracy.