Excerpt from How Luke Was Written: Considerations Affecting the Two-Document Theory With Special Reference to the Phenomena of Order in the Non-Marcan Matter Common to Matthew and Luke
In criticism, no less than in natural science, the kind of answer which you get depends upon the kind of question that you put. In the investigation of the non Marcan coincidences of Matthew and Luke I submit that, through causes which are perspicuous and intelligible, the wrong question was put. From the first, one term in the Synoptic problem had been Mark, the other term mt.+lk. The manipulation of these terms in research concerning the Triple Tradition had recently issued in a striking success. Another problem, apparently a similar problem, had now to be faced. Coincidences in Matthew and Luke had again to be accounted for. What more natural than to operate with the same arrangement of terms as before? Mark is, in the nature of the case, eliminated. Mt.+lk. Remains. This term must now be related to some second term. The question was put, To what second term can we relate it?
About the Publisher
Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com
This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.
Die Inhaltsangabe kann sich auf eine andere Ausgabe dieses Titels beziehen.
Anbieter: Forgotten Books, London, Vereinigtes Königreich
Paperback. Zustand: New. Print on Demand. This book reevaluates the written sources traditionally used to explain the similarities between the Gospels of Matthew and Luke, challenging long-held assumptions about the existence of a hypothetical document called Q. Through a meticulous examination of non-Marcan passages common to Matthew and Luke, the author presents evidence that Luke was directly dependent on Matthew for this material. The dominance of the Two-Document Theory in Synoptic studies is historically traced to the work of Ferdinand Christian Baur, who sought to prove that Mark was the latest of the Gospels. However, the author argues that the data indicate a dependence of Luke on Matthew, rather than the traditional view of Mark as the source for both. This book offers a comprehensive analysis of the non-Marcan coincidences between Matthew and Luke, providing new insights into the compositional history of the Gospels. This book is a reproduction of an important historical work, digitally reconstructed using state-of-the-art technology to preserve the original format. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in the book. print-on-demand item. Bestandsnummer des Verkäufers 9781332933341_0
Anzahl: Mehr als 20 verfügbar
Anbieter: PBShop.store US, Wood Dale, IL, USA
PAP. Zustand: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000. Bestandsnummer des Verkäufers LW-9781332933341
Anbieter: PBShop.store UK, Fairford, GLOS, Vereinigtes Königreich
PAP. Zustand: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000. Bestandsnummer des Verkäufers LW-9781332933341
Anzahl: 15 verfügbar