Deepak sahni (6 Ergebnisse)

Autor
Mit der Detailsuche verfeinern

Optimieren Sie Ihre Suche

  • Bücher (6)

bis

Benutzerdefinierte Preisspanne (EUR)

bis

    • Verlag: Geophytology, 1974

      • Softcover

      Anbieter: Eryops Books, Stephenville, TX, USAEryops Books

      Verkäufer/-in mit 5 Sternen
      Verkäufer/-in kontaktieren

      Zustand: Gebraucht - Gut

      EUR 0,90

      EUR 5,23 Versand 
      Versand innerhalb von USA

      Anzahl: 1 verfügbar

      In den Warenkorb

      No Binding. Zustand: Very Good. ORIGINAL 1774 Reprint/Offprint of journal article; no covers issued; light creasing of corners; o/w in very good condition. Journal.

    • Sprache: Englisch

      Verlag: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing, 2010

      3838313771 / 9783838313771

      • Softcover

      Anbieter: Mispah books, Redhill, SURRE, Vereinigtes KönigreichMispah books

      Verkäufer/-in mit 4 Sternen
      Verkäufer/-in kontaktieren

      Zustand: Gebraucht - Wie neu

      EUR 121,39

      EUR 29,17 Versand 
      Versand von Vereinigtes Königreich nach USA

      Anzahl: 1 verfügbar

      Paperback. Zustand: Like New. LIKE NEW. SHIPS FROM MULTIPLE LOCATIONS. book.

    • Sprache: Englisch

      Verlag: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing Sep 2009, 2009

      3838313771 / 9783838313771

      • Softcover
      • Print-on-Demand

      Anbieter: BuchWeltWeit Ludwig Meier e.K., Bergisch Gladbach, DeutschlandBuchWeltWeit Ludwig Meier e.K.

      Verkäufer/-in mit 5 Sternen
      Verkäufer/-in kontaktieren

      Zustand: Neu

      EUR 49,00

      EUR 23,00 Versand 
      Versand von Deutschland nach USA

      Anzahl: 2 verfügbar

      Taschenbuch. Zustand: Neu. This item is printed on demand - it takes 3-4 days longer - Neuware -Prioritizing software requirements helps to determine which requirements are most important, and the order in which requirements should be developed and tested throughout the development life cycle. By prioritizing the requirements, software engineers can put focus on a subset of all requirements, and implement these in a particular release. This work aims to analyze two ratio scale prioritization techniques named Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Cumulative Voting (CV) by a controlled experiment, conducted on software engineering/computer science master students. The experiment was designed to compare time consumption, scalability and accuracy between the two techniques. All these evaluation parameters are combined together to find out which technique is more suitable to use when prioritizing software requirements. The results of the experiment indicate that CV is less time consuming than AHP. It was also found that CV is more scalable than AHP. Furthermore, CV is regarded as more accurate than AHP when measured subjectively in post-test. 80 pp. Englisch.

    • Sprache: Englisch

      Verlag: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing, 2009

      3838313771 / 9783838313771

      • Softcover
      • Print-on-Demand

      Anbieter: moluna, Greven, Deutschlandmoluna

      Verkäufer/-in mit 5 Sternen
      Verkäufer/-in kontaktieren

      Zustand: Neu

      EUR 41,05

      EUR 48,99 Versand 
      Versand von Deutschland nach USA

      Anzahl: Mehr als 20 verfügbar

      Zustand: New. Dieser Artikel ist ein Print on Demand Artikel und wird nach Ihrer Bestellung fuer Sie gedruckt. Prioritizing software requirements helps to determine which requirements are most important, and the order in which requirements should be developed and tested throughout the development life cycle. By prioritizing the requirements, software engineers can p.

    • Sprache: Englisch

      Verlag: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing, 2010

      3838313771 / 9783838313771

      • Softcover
      • Print-on-Demand

      Anbieter: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, DeutschlandAHA-BUCH GmbH

      Verkäufer/-in mit 5 Sternen
      Verkäufer/-in kontaktieren

      Zustand: Neu

      EUR 70,99

      EUR 30,50 Versand 
      Versand von Deutschland nach USA

      Anzahl: 1 verfügbar

      Taschenbuch. Zustand: Neu. nach der Bestellung gedruckt Neuware - Printed after ordering - Prioritizing software requirements helps to determine which requirements are most important, and the order in which requirements should be developed and tested throughout the development life cycle. By prioritizing the requirements, software engineers can put focus on a subset of all requirements, and implement these in a particular release. This work aims to analyze two ratio scale prioritization techniques named Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Cumulative Voting (CV) by a controlled experiment, conducted on software engineering/computer science master students. The experiment was designed to compare time consumption, scalability and accuracy between the two techniques. All these evaluation parameters are combined together to find out which technique is more suitable to use when prioritizing software requirements. The results of the experiment indicate that CV is less time consuming than AHP. It was also found that CV is more scalable than AHP. Furthermore, CV is regarded as more accurate than AHP when measured subjectively in post-test.

    • Sprache: Englisch

      Verlag: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing Sep 2009, 2009

      3838313771 / 9783838313771

      • Softcover
      • Print-on-Demand

      Anbieter: buchversandmimpf2000, Emtmannsberg, BAYE, Deutschlandbuchversandmimpf2000

      Verkäufer/-in mit 5 Sternen
      Verkäufer/-in kontaktieren

      Zustand: Neu

      EUR 49,00

      EUR 60,00 Versand 
      Versand von Deutschland nach USA

      Anzahl: 1 verfügbar

      Taschenbuch. Zustand: Neu. This item is printed on demand - Print on Demand Titel. Neuware -Prioritizing software requirements helps to determine which requirements are most important, and the order in which requirements should be developed and tested throughout the development life cycle. By prioritizing the requirements, software engineers can put focus on a subset of all requirements, and implement these in a particular release. This work aims to analyze two ratio scale prioritization techniques named Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Cumulative Voting (CV) by a controlled experiment, conducted on software engineering/computer science master students. The experiment was designed to compare time consumption, scalability and accuracy between the two techniques. All these evaluation parameters are combined together to find out which technique is more suitable to use when prioritizing software requirements. The results of the experiment indicate that CV is less time consuming than AHP. It was also found that CV is more scalable than AHP. Furthermore, CV is regarded as more accurate than AHP when measured subjectively in post-test.VDM Verlag, Dudweiler Landstraße 99, 66123 Saarbrücken 80 pp. Englisch.