clayton ellen wright (17 Ergebnisse)

Soft cover. Zustand: Fine. 1st Edition. First edition, first printing of this cookbook with recipes from members of Crime Writers of Canada including Peter Robinson, J. Robert Janes, Paul Grescoe, L.R. Wright, Michelle Spring and more. Wire ring Binding. In fine condition.

Paperback. Zustand: Very Good. Connecting readers with great books since 1972! Used textbooks may not include companion materials such as access codes, etc. May have some wear or limited writing/highlighting. We ship orders daily and Customer Service is our top priority!

Paperback. Zustand: Good. Connecting readers with great books since 1972! Used textbooks may not include companion materials such as access codes, etc. May have some wear or writing/highlighting. We ship orders daily and Customer Service is our top priority!

Paperback. Zustand: Very Good. No Jacket. May have limited writing in cover pages. Pages are unmarked. ~ ThriftBooks: Read More, Spend Less.

Softbound. Zustand: Very Good. Quarto, paper covers, 325-424 pp., index to Volume 28, ads Symposum Editor: Jesse A. Goldner. Articles are "Introduction: A Time for Gratitude," Ellen Wright Clayton, "Risks, Benefits, and Conflicts of Interest in Human Research: Ethical Evolution in the Changing World of Science," Greg Koski, "Definig and Describing Benefit Appropriatly in Clininical Trials," Nancy M.P. King, "The Ethical Analysis of Risk," Charles Weijer, "The Ethics of Clinical Trials: A Child's View, "Dealing with Conflicts of Interest in Biomedical Research: IRB Oversight as the Next Best Solution tothe Abolitionist Approach," Jesse A. Goldner, court decisons, index, peer reviewers.

Softbound. Zustand: Very Good. Quarto, paper covers, 205-324 pp., ads Articles are "Risking Ethical Insolvency: A Survey of Trends in Criminal DNA Databanking," Jonathan Kimmelman, "Commentary," Christopher H. Asplen, "Expert Testimony by Persons Trained in Ethical Reasoning: The Case of Andrew Sawatzky," Francois Baylis, "Commentary: The Wizard of Oughts," Giles Scofield, "Commenary: Weighing and Comparing Expert Testimony by Medical Ethcists," Lawrence J. Scheniderman,"Rebuttal: Expert Ethics Testiony," Francoise Baylis, Giles Scofield Responds, "Narcissus Meets Pandora," "Genetic PrivacyLaws and Patients' Fear of Discrimnation by Health Insurers: The View from Genetic Counselors," Mark A. Hall and Stephen S. Rich, "A Survey of Physician Training Programs in Risk Management and Communications Sklls for Malpractice Prevention," Frank V. Lefevre, Teresa M. Waters, and Peter P. Budetti, "Language and Reality at the End of Life," Raphael Cohen-Almagor, "Commentary: Is There a Lingua-Franca for Bioethics at the End of Life?" Arthur R. Derse, "A Concise Rebuttal," Raphael Cohen-Almagor, "Lessons to be Learned From Harvard Pilgrim HMO's Fiscal Rlooer Coaster Ride," Frances H. Miller and Walter W. Miller, Jr., "Recent Development in Health Law.".

Zustand: good. A copy that has been read, remains in good condition. All pages are intact, and the cover is intact. The spine and cover show signs of wear. Pages can include notes and highlighting and show signs of wear, and the copy can include "From the library of" labels or previous owner inscriptions. 100% GUARANTEE! Shipped with delivery confirmation, if you're not satisfied with purchase please return item! Ships via media mail.

Paperback. Zustand: Brand New. 224 pages. 8.75x5.75x0.50 inches. In Stock.

Zustand: Brand New. New. US edition. Expediting shipping for all USA and Europe orders excluding PO Box. Excellent Customer Service.

Zustand: New. Brand New.

Zustand: New. In.

Hardcover. Zustand: Brand New. 1st edition. 276 pages. 9.25x6.25x0.75 inches. In Stock.

Hardback. Zustand: New. Medical malpractice suits today can result in multi-million-dollar settlements, and a practicing physician can pay $100,000 or more annually for malpractice insurance. Some complain that lawyers and plaintiffs are overcompensated by exorbitant judgments that add to the rising cost of health care. But there has been very little evidence to show whether these arguments are true. In this timely work, six experts in health policy, law, and medicine study nearly 200 malpractice claims to show that, contrary to popular perceptions, victims of malpractice are not overcompensated and our legal system for dealing with malpractice claims is not defective. The authors survey claims filed in Florida between 1986 and 1989 by people who suffered permanent injury or death during birth or during treatment in an emergency room. How often did illegitimate claims result in financial awards? What was the relation between the injury and the amount the patient lost economically? How much did the plaintiffs actually recover? How did the claimants choose their lawyers and what kind of relationship did they have?Contrary to common perceptions, in the majority of cases the claims were merited, and the authors found that claimants were on average substantially undercompensated--only about one-fifth of plaintiffs recovered more than their economic loss caused by injury or death. The evidence in this book suggests that placing dollar limits on malpractice cases is unjustified and that our tort system is not so faulty after all.

Zustand: New. pp. 276 Index.

Zustand: New. pp. 276.

Gebunden. Zustand: New. InhaltsverzeichnisList of Tables List of Figures List of Boxes Preface Acknowledgments Ch. 1: Setting the Stage Frank A. Sloan Ch. 2: The Sample Frank A. Sloan, Penny B. Githens. Ch. 3: The Injuries, Antecedents, and Consequence.

Hardback. Zustand: New. Medical malpractice suits today can result in multi-million-dollar settlements, and a practicing physician can pay $100,000 or more annually for malpractice insurance. Some complain that lawyers and plaintiffs are overcompensated by exorbitant judgments that add to the rising cost of health care. But there has been very little evidence to show whether these arguments are true. In this timely work, six experts in health policy, law, and medicine study nearly 200 malpractice claims to show that, contrary to popular perceptions, victims of malpractice are not overcompensated and our legal system for dealing with malpractice claims is not defective. The authors survey claims filed in Florida between 1986 and 1989 by people who suffered permanent injury or death during birth or during treatment in an emergency room. How often did illegitimate claims result in financial awards? What was the relation between the injury and the amount the patient lost economically? How much did the plaintiffs actually recover? How did the claimants choose their lawyers and what kind of relationship did they have?Contrary to common perceptions, in the majority of cases the claims were merited, and the authors found that claimants were on average substantially undercompensated--only about one-fifth of plaintiffs recovered more than their economic loss caused by injury or death. The evidence in this book suggests that placing dollar limits on malpractice cases is unjustified and that our tort system is not so faulty after all.